Commons:Requests for comment/Using imagery from VOGUE Taiwan

A number of videos on the VOGUE Taiwan YouTube channel are licensed under a Creative Commons license, such as this video of Simone Biles and this Q&A with Lorde. However, those two videos are both reuploads from other channels - the first one being from Glamour, the second from Vogue. These are all Conde Nast publications, and while the VOGUE Taiwan account is verified, meaning it's safe to assume that it is also part of Conde Nast, these original videos were not licensed under a Creative Commons license. So, at least to my knowledge, this seems to be a reupload of a video under a different license than the original. I am not sure what should be done here, hence why I'm opening this RFC. There have been a number of images from these reuploaded videos on the VOGUE Taiwan channel uploaded to Commons, some of which have been nominated for deletion - some stay, some are deleted. Here are some of the nominations. I hope that a consensus can be found here, as having these images in a state of limbo is not beneficial. --LivelyRatification (talk) 00:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

I cannot see how this merits a RfC. At most this merits a post in the Village Pump for additional input. Videos that are taken from somewhere else cannot be uploaded, and videos that VOGUE Taiwan took themselves can be. Zoozaz1 (talk) 19:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• Only the original copyright © holders can change the license of copyrighted materials, if VOGUE Taiwan claims a different license for a pre-existing unfree work we should take it as serious as we would when "Randomuser122345" does it here. In other words, they are only trustworthy for their own material. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)