User talk:Multichill

Always busy.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail. I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

Just for the form[edit]

schilderijen van UB Leiden[edit]

Hallo Maarten,

Ik heb vandaag uit de beeldbank van de UB Leiden (http://digitalcollections.universiteitleiden.nl) een selectie gemaakt van schilderijen die vrij downloadbaar zijn voor het project Sum of all Paintings. Het zijn 279 records met de volgende variabelen: item, label, shelfmark, materiaal (=schilderij), handle. Als je mij je email stuurt, kan ik het spreadsheet opsturen. Kan je daarmee de images toevoegen aan wikimedia commons?

Wil je ze dan, behalve in Sum of all Paintings, ook toevoegen aan een categorie "Paintings" in "Category:Collections of Leiden University Library".

Een stukje uit het bestand:

itemnr	Label	handle
item:1581995	Portret van Stephanus Marchant\, hoogleraar Rechtsgeleerdheid te Leiden Icones 101	http://hdl.handle.net/1887.1/item:1581995
item:1582018	Portret van Lucas Schacht\, hoogleraar Geneeskunde te Leiden Icones 103	http://hdl.handle.net/1887.1/item:1582018

Als je de link met de handle in een browser plakt, zie je een pagina van een portret met metadata. Onder de downloadknop met het pijltje zit een medium sized JPGEG. De link voor downloaden van de JPG die hoort bij het eerste item:1581995 is http://digitalcollections.universiteitleiden.nl//view/item/1581995/datastream/JPG/download.

De hoogleraren op deze portretten zijn allen waarschijnlijk als persoon al opgenomen in wikidata. Zou je die portretten ook nog aan de hoogleraren kunnen koppelen?

Ik heb wel je Wikimedia Usernaam, maar niet je email adres. Mijn mail adres is [email protected].

Liesbeth van Wijk deelnemer Wiki Techstorm 2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wijkemvan (talk • contribs) 20:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quadro di Rubens[edit]

Ciao, spero sia il posto giusto dove fatto questa domanda, in caso errato scusami e indicami come dialogare con te Ti contatto per il dipinto "Circoncisione" di Rubens che, se non sbaglio, hai inserito in WikiMedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circoncisione_di_Gesù_-_Rubens.jpg

Quella foto l'ho fatta io nel 1998 quando facevo il fotografo di Arte e Architettura (ovviamente ho l'originale) Vorrei potermela attribuire ma non so come farlo, se non caricandola tra le mie e poi inserendola in Wikipedia

Puoi darmi indicazioni? grazie michele

PS la puoi vedere tra queste: https://www.micheleferraris.it/project/arte-architettura-genova/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMic70 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:European pressphoto agency

....... Adding structured data: date, copyright, source & author thanks a million..............how to thank a bot...............Multichill (great code)[edit]

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		........one more time....amazing code for a bot..............A barnstar for you Multichill (Structured data) great work (how to thank a bot)

following the breadcrumbs.............

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8343766

Photo deletion question[edit]

Hi, I am new at this. First upload. I have received autorisation from author to use this photo. How can I make this clear and avoid deletion? Thank you

Renaming file[edit]

Hello again, could you rename this file to "Free-ranging mixed breed dog"? Thank you. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mexican_Street_Dog.jpg

License migration[edit]

Hi Multichill! How are you doing?

If I remember correct you promised me more than 10 years ago that I would get a million barnstars if I finished the license migration of GFDL!

Well its finished yet but I'm getting closer.

I have been visiting wikis around the world trying to make them clean up files. As you can imagine it is a never ending job because if local wikis do not have active users that monitor new uploads it will soon be messy.

But I have been implementing the license migration templates on some wikis that did not have it. And I have been helping wikis finish the license migration.

On Japanese Wikipedia it was extra fun because they had 64k files licensed GFDL. 37k had GFDL and 27k had GFDL-no-disclaimers. But to make it crazy they had a fancy system where some of the files with GFDL had disclaimers and some did not. So many of the files that was moved to Commons did not have the disclaimers they should have or they had disclaimers but should not. Also the license migration system was very complex. But I managed to change the templates so files without disclaimers used the template GFDL and files with disclaimers used the template GFDL-ja. I also completed the license migration.

On a few wikis GFDL-ja means GFDL-self but on Commons that would be "files from Japanese Wikipedia with disclaimers". So I fixed FileImporter to do it right.

Recently I have been touring wikis to see if GFDL only were listed on MediaWiki:Licenses. It was on about 54 wikis and I managed to get 36 wikis to remove it and 18 have not (yet). (m:User:MGA73/Media per wiki)

And check this out en:Template:No more GFDL :-) That should help too.

So now I think there is a chance to finish in 2022!

But now I also know that if I had done this more systematic from the beginning it would have been so much easier. Much of the trouble and work could have been avoided.

For example MediaWiki:Licenses and template names should have been fixed. Some wikis still use GFDL with disclaimers for new uploads! That should have been stopped years ago. And we should have global bots that tag all new uploads that do not have a license.

Anyway just wanted to share the news with you. If you have any ideas they are of course welcome. --MGA73 (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What if someone gave a permission via OTRS in 2007 for the license GFDL. Do you remember if we relicense because it is before November 2008 or did we always say that if there is an OTRS then migration is not possible? --MGA73 (talk) 11:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MGA73: I'm traveling (now that it's still possible). Will reply later. Multichill (talk) 12:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Safe travel! --MGA73 (talk) 13:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Are you still traveling? --MGA73 (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I asked someone else about OTRS and the reply was that we can probably relicense. Do you agree? --MGA73 (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I checked some of the old files with an OTRS and my bot marked them with migration=relicense so I guess we agreed that OTRS does not block for relicense. We just have to be carefull to see if the file was originally uploaded somewhere else. So I will relicense the files with an OTRS too. --MGA73 (talk) 10:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

follow the breadcrumbs of Php and say thanks for the work[edit]

curprev 13:22, 10 October 2020‎ BotMultichillT talk contribs‎ 2,047 bytes +1,514‎ ‎Changed an entity: Adding structured data: date & copyright undo

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

great work, virtual slice of pizza Multichill

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:US Navy 060201-N-5832A-004 An aircraft handler gets an F-14D Tomcat assigned to the Black Lions of Fighter Squadron two One three (VF-213) into position for launch.jpg[edit]

File:US Navy 060201-N-5832A-004 An aircraft handler gets an F-14D Tomcat assigned to the Black Lions of Fighter Squadron two One three (VF-213) into position for launch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 11:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:20111209-NRCS-LSC-0001 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Op deze manier blijft er weinig over[edit]

Multichill, er werd een foto verwijderd op een pagina van mijn volglijst. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Istiqlal Mosque Hierbij is nu hier ook de begeleidende tekst van bij de foto's verdwenen. Jammer. Het ging om de foto COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM De Istiqlal moskee en de kathedraal TMnr 20018358.jpg. Dus met de moskee (een lelijk blok, naar mijn mening) ging ook de omgeving van de moskee verloren zoals de kathedraal. Is het niet mogelijk om de moskee afte blokken met grijs? Of de contouren volgooien met een emmertje grijs? Lidewij (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lidewij een beetje gefrustreerde gebruiker over het feit dat er zoveel foto's zijn verwijderd? Ik heb een reactie achtergelaten. Multichill (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Citation needed"[edit]

Is this edit, where you added a "citation needed" to another user's comment, the best way for an administrator to act? I am unaware of any Wikimedia Commons policy on this, but common decency and w:Wikipedia:TPO suggest that this is not the most productive way to contribute to a discussion. Mysteryman blue 19:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a user comment, that's an picture with a nonsense description. If it would have been a user comment, it would have been signed with ~~~~ so it would be clear who is stating this opinion. Multichill (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously we disagree, but I think it's pretty clear from the position of the image and the context in prose that the image is a part of a specific user comment. Mysteryman blue 19:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't clear to me who added the picture. Multichill (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I have attributed the image caption to the user who added the image and have removed the "citation needed". Mysteryman blue 20:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping[edit]

Thank you for letting me know about the discussion. Unfortunately right now a family member is very ill and I am going to leave it to the community to decide that one. I don't think that Mr. Trung is really here for educational purposes, nor is that barnstar particularly educational, but faced with the mortality of a close member of my family, I just don't have the time or energy to fight for anything - even against a serial troublemaker. Thank you for the defense, sorry I left you to do that for me. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: take care, other things are much more important that trolling people on the interwebs. I restored your decision at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hot sex barnstar.png by deleting the file. Multichill (talk) 22:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mysterymanblue: , thanks for informing me about this in your e-mail. Regarding "I don't think that Mr. Trung is really here for educational purposes" and "- even against a serial troublemaker" what is that supposed to mean? What "series of troubles" did I cause here recently then? This just seems like an excuse to insult me. I am beginning to understand why Fæ left the project after receiving similar insults. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Regardless of the correctness of your administrative action, your comment here in which you call a fellow administrator "stupid" and fail to assume good faith in "trolling" users who happen to disagree with you is highly inappropriate. Mysteryman blue 00:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nizami 48[edit]

Hi.Please delete photo Nizami 48 building —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.135.166.226 (talk) 12:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

follow the digital breadcrumbs to say... great job, once again :Multichill[edit]

curprev 22:03, 5 October 2020‎ BotMultichillT talk contribs‎ 3,999 bytes +2,909‎ ‎Changed an entity: Adding structured data: copyright, source, date & author undo

following the digital breadcrumbs to say... great job, once again :Multichill structured data great job

boxed water....amazing in the U.S.A.

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 06:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

‎Changed an entity: Adding structured data: copyright, source, date & author ...i say thanks with a virtual slice of pizza....cheers..structured data.

File:McEvoy.png[edit]

File:McEvoy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooler logo.GIF[edit]

File:Wooler logo.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

a barnstar for you! :Schlurcher[edit]

Barnstar. Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata[edit]

Barnstar. Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your amazing work on Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata...17th of October 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to submit a session proposal to WikidataCon 2021 (deadline 20 October)[edit]

Hi. I'm writing to you as a co-curator of the 'Sister projects' track along with Susanna Ånäs for WikidataCon 2021, which will take place online on 29-31 October 2021. The conference website is at [1].

We would like to invite you to submit a session proposal to the track, specifically a lightning talk on how you have been working with SDC here on Commons. We would also love to hear about any other work you are doing, or would like to do in the future, that relates to Wikidata and its sister projects.

If you are interested, you can find information about how to submit a session proposal at [2], and you can access the submission form at [3]. Please submit a session proposal through the Pretalx process so that we can review and schedule it appropriately - and make sure to mark it as a 'Sister projects' track proposal. Please note that we cannot accept a session outside of the Pretalx process. We also encourage you to submit talks to other tracks if you are interested!

Note that the deadline for submitting proposals is the 20th October - sorry for the short notice! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keller am Gräbelesberg im LSG Albstadt-Bitz (2019).jpg[edit]

Hi Multichill, I changed the coordinates from this photo because they were not quite correct. Now an error message appears. Could you please correct. I am not able to change structured data. And thanks again for the effort of adding them all the time. Regards --Olga Ernst (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How does BotMultichillT know botany?[edit]

I'm amazed at the botanical knowledge of this bot, when it entered a synonym of a species here, apparently correctly. How does the bot know that? Or does “Bot” stand for “botany”? ;-) ◅ SebastianHelm (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SebastianHelm: no clue about botany, but it's pretty decent when it comes to logic. In this case the file is in use at Rosa villosa which is the gallery for Category:Rosa villosa. Multichill (talk) 19:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is BotMultichillT running properly at the moment?[edit]

Hello Multichill. You are in charge of BotMultichillT, which takes a lot of work off many people here. It inserts structured data into files and arranges the categories (or removes unnecessary hidden categories). With my last file (File:Kasteln Castle Schenkenberg Valley.jpg) BotMultichillT does not seem to have become active yet. Is it possible that BotMultichillT is not running properly? How can I get BotMultichillT to edit my latest upload? Thank you Chme82 (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chme82: Yeah, some jerkish actions broke a bunch of bots and I didn't really have the time, energy and motivation to fix it. See phab:T280806. Multichill (talk) 22:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Multichill: Thank you for your response. Just as I thought. Other bots are not running as they should either. I guess I'll have to wait and see. Chme82 (talk) 10:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chme82: some jobs are working again. I have to check what is still broken now. Multichill (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Multichill: Thank you. Chme82 (talk) 09:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not adding all structured data[edit]

HI, your BotMultichillT doesn't add the same info to Structured data although two different images has the same general information.

File:Female_back_3d-shaded_human_illustration.svg didn't receive
- source of file
- original creation by uploader
File:Male_back_3d-shaded_human_illustration.svg didn't receive
- creator/some value
- Wikimedia username
- Goran_tek-en
- URL
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Goran_tek-en
- author name string
- Goran tek-en

I'm pretty sure I added the same information on them (just different file name). I can add it manually but it seems strange to me. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have a similar question. Why your bot didn't add "instance of"=photograph here and here (I had to do it myself), while it did it on File:Plafond de la chapelle des Maccabées 3.jpg (i.e. [4]). Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Medea-chart database on old nautical charts[edit]

Hi, I’m sending this message to all participants of Commons Wikimaps listed here, so that I can be pretty sure it will get to some of you. I am the Principal Investigator of the ERC funded project Medea-Chart ([5]), hosted by the University of Lisbon, whose scientific objective is the study of the genesis, evolution and use of nautical charts from the Middle Ages to the early modern period. One of the visible outcomes of our project is the Medea-Chart database, aimed at storing and making available information and images of all extant manuscript nautical charts: [6]. Since the images of old maps and charts are now in the public domain and our database is open to all, I’m sure your project could benefit from it. The most obvious way would be to download from there all the images you are interested in, but I imagine you could use the tool for more sophisticated purposes. For now, I invite all of you to go there, browse the database, do geographical searches, read our “Chart of the Week” mini-articles, etc. You don’t even need to register for that. Registration is only required for those interested in downloading high resolution images or producing reports. Best wishes and have fun, Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rex Whistler (1905-1944) - Lady Caroline Paget (1913–1976), Later Lady Duff - 1176330 - National Trust.jpg[edit]

File:Rex Whistler (1905-1944) - Lady Caroline Paget (1913–1976), Later Lady Duff - 1176330 - National Trust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 18:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Module:License[edit]

It took me a while, but I began assembling Module:License, I will also try to add code for handling PD statements as described on Wikidata. --Jarekt alt (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news alternative Jarekt. I'll comment on Module talk:License. Multichill (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My Alter ego is for situations where I have access to the web, but no access to my phone, so I can not log-in to my main account without 2-factor authorization or some other complicated procedures. --Jarekt (talk) 04:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Media_needing_category_review_in_use_at_da.wikipedia[edit]

Category:Media_needing_category_review_in_use_at_da.wikipedia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Pacha Tchernof (talk) 21:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Walt Disney Studios Park.jpeg

Yours sincerely, (Oinkers42) (talk) 04:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GLAM and batch uploads[edit]

Hi! Institution:Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen and some other GLAM are interessted in working together with Wikipedia and some Danish Wikipedians are trying to help batch upload files. Commons:GLAM have some tips to get started but we do not have many Danish Wikipedians that have done mass uploads.

The plan is to do something like File:En såret dansk kriger (1865 painting).jpg but the license template also request a United States public domain tag. And they have made an agreement with the photographers so instead of PD-Art to cover the copyright for the photo they would like to use Cc0. So instead of {{Artwork}} perhaps {{Art Photo}} is better because that would solve the problem of any copyright related to the photo. But what copyright tag would be good for the painting? {{PD-old-auto-expired|deathyear=1xxx}} or can you think of something better?

I know you use wikidata a lot so I found one of your uploads File:Coin of Caracalla, Roman Emperor, from Gabala, Yale University Art Gallery, inv. 1938.6000.1271 - YDEA - 139752.jpg to show them that wikidata can fill out all fields. I guess that if they can figure out how to put data in wikidata then uploading the files on Commons would be easier because then you do not need to add much info on Commons. Your bot would take care of structured data? --MGA73 (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MGA73: that's good news! Commons:Guide to batch uploading & Commons:Guide to content partnerships might also contain useful info (but might be slightly outdated).

To get the US part {{PD-old-auto-expired}} should be used instead of {{PD-old-auto}} ([7]).

It's good that the museum explicitly adds a license. We have the {{Licensed-PD-Art}} template for that. See for example {{Licensed-PD-Art|PD-old-auto-expired|cc-by-sa-4.0|deathyear=1915}} on File:Robert Hermann Raudner - Schleißheimer Linden - 8546 - Bavarian State Painting Collections.jpg.

My workflow is to first add the metadata to Wikidata (Q29941317). If the metadata is complete, this will trigger an upload. Currently only works for paintings and is described at d:Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Automated image uploads.

As you can see on File:Robert Hermann Raudner - Schleißheimer Linden - 8546 - Bavarian State Painting Collections.jpg, the artwork template is empty. Multichill (talk) 10:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! We have some good places to look for photos but the tricky part is that we lack users that knows how to mass upload. For example the Queen of Denmark just released 10.000 photos on https://kgl-fotosamling.kongernessamling.dk/login/welcome.jspx and I have an old idea of copying thousands of old maps from https://hkpn.gst.dk/ to Commons.

I think our guy working on "Statens Museum for Kunst" will like your tips with the licenses. And I think he likes wikidata too so if he can figure out how to do it right it should be great. --MGA73 (talk) 11:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

digital representation of (P6243)[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you removed some of these statements. So what should be the value for this property? The modeling page doesn't exit yet: Commons:Structured data/Modeling. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PYANN (PYann) In this case nothing because no item for the photo exists.

You might have missed why digital representation of (P6243) was created: To link a photo of a 2D artwork here to the item on Commons. For example to link File:Man in a Blue Cap - Jan van Eyck - Google Cultural Institute.jpg to Portrait of a Man with a Blue Chaperon (Q3553389). The usage on Commons has become a bit of a mess and it still needs to be cleaned up.

Probably best to use fabrication method (P2079) digital photography (Q173095) for these cases. Multichill (talk) 12:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but this property was used in this case File:Maison des têtes - statue du tonnelier alsacien (Colmar).jpg, which is not a 2D artwork, so I don't undertand the distinction with the "depicts" statement. And in this case File:Auto wreck, USA, 1923.jpg? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: that's exactly the mess I'm talking about. For the second case: The target of digital representation of (P6243) should always be a specific instance, not a class of things like digital photograph (Q85431214) & gelatin silver print (Q64029133). Multichill (talk) 12:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am cleaning these. For File:Auto wreck, USA, 1923.jpg, whould we have instance of (P31) or fabrication method (P2079) for gelatin silver print (Q64029133). I would like to be able to search all images of, say a place, which are either digital or not. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And that's where you hit the point why I haven't done that much for SDC in the last couple of months: Our search engine is still very incomplete. When a file here is linked to an item on Wikidata (using digital representation of (P6243) or some other method), it would be a bit stupid if we have to duplicate all depicts (P180) statements (we're not monkeys to quote Jean-Fred). The other day I was talking with Jarek about this on User_talk:Jarekt#Adding_more_structured_data_to_search. The basic idea is to add some more logic to Module:Artwork that grabs the relevant data from Wikidata (like depicts statements) and include it in the filepage here so that it turns up in search. We're not there yet, but it sure would be a lot better than to try to duplicate everything here. Multichill (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also would you main having a look at Commons talk:Structured data#CC-0 conflicts with PD statement? Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look and reply over there. Multichill (talk) 12:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten deletion requests[edit]

Hallo Multichill, happy new year,
with the vandalistic mass deletion requests of J. Patrick Fischer, you have already left a suitable comment in most cases ("no wonder our deletion backlog is huge if people start dumping it full with useless deletion requests. Is this the purge of East-Timor? I contest all these nominations of these by now historic military photos"). Unfortunately you missed some deletion requests (see below). I have already commented there. But it is surely better if two users comment there for keeping.

--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 07:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding main subject (P921) to media that already has both depicts (P180) and digital representation of (P6243) does not make any sense.[edit]

Like this edit. /ℇsquilo 11:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does and you shouldn't be removing it (bot will restore it anyway). It's part of the effort to get digital representation of (P6243) cleaned up. Multichill (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

questions about p6243[edit]

I remember you. I remember you every time I get that one warning when uploading an image that I don't need to upload. Your improvements to commons have made me more sloppy and carefree!

I was glad to see your software making changes to the structured data. I added p6243 to my files to keep that bot off them. It seemed that there was a relationship between the bot (not the author) and my real life involving free drinks and other crap like that. Of course, without actual evidence or anything real that would correlate this, I very well might be wrong. Putting my own structured data on my files could hardly be considered an over-reaction.

My relationship with p6243 is mostly via scans. Any "label" I use to link the files stru. data to the item will always feel like I am saying "red is red". Scans are weird things. They have duplicates sometimes at Internet Archive and/or Hathitrust and/or Library of Congress and/or other sources (colleges, governments, etc). Many times, the file here is not an exact duplicate of the source as some blank pages are removed, flaws in pagination are fixed, I have one that needs a whole section removed and a different scan used instead. I tried to link the p6243 to what that file was a version of and got complaints.

Wikidata has an item p996: "document file on Commons", it would be nice for my "red is red or 2 is 2" problem (self-definition is supposed to be avoided except in proofs where it is the goal) if there were a "Item on wikidata" for scans. It is a hair split, but wikidata seems to be a magnet for hairsplitters.

Okay, all of that being said, I am curious what the new requirements for the structured data are. I read here and there about "Main subject", which, for the current set of scans I am working on will be "childrens literature", I suppose. "Main subject" will be more of a challenge with novels and starts to border on "genre" which is such a nightmare and I avoid more anything else here other than the psychological profiles of fictional characters. Eek!

I completely understand that scans (pdf, djvu and other uncollated files) are a small portion of the files here and in many ways, a weird case. Also, if you are the same MultiChill, it is always nice to see your activity. If you are not the same, well, it is always nice to remember "smarter" times here.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at administrator noticeboard about User:BotMultichillT[edit]

Hi. Just to let you know, a user has started a discussion over at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections about your bot. From Hill To Shore (talk) 23:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Essential singularity[edit]

Hello I'm a mathematics student! I have a doubt about the graph plot under "Essential singularity". The hue represents the absolute value and the luminance represents the argument, right? It's given otherwise there. Kindly correct me if I'm wrong. Raina Mary Thomas [email protected] 2409:4073:294:4895:2C3F:2325:6A6F:727 14:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, larger.jpeg[edit]

Hi, What's the problem with these coordinates ː https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Raising_the_Flag_on_Iwo_Jima,_larger.jpeg&diff=622082751&oldid=622082442&diffmode=source Thanks, Yann (talk)

@Yann: nothing wrong with these coordinates, just the wrong location. The coordinates shouldn't be on M77731066, but on Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima (Q117693). That's where I moved the coordinates of depicted place (P9149). Just the template logic still needs to be updated to show the {{Object location}}. See also Commons:Structured_data/Modeling/Depiction#Works_of_art. 16:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Vervangen van RCE categorie-suggesties?[edit]

Je bot zet hier een (template) categorie-suggestie om in een niet bestaande categorielink. Lijkt me niet de bedoeling toch? Ciell (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ciell: dat is bewust om dit eindelijk maar eens weg te kunnen werken. Zie Commons_talk:Rijksdienst_voor_het_Cultureel_Erfgoed#Oude_templates_opruimen. Multichill (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

author = Creator not Category[edit]

Moin Moin Multichill from Germany, your bot did the following edit and not we have around 500 pictures in the Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no instance of because the Category include the Wikidata Infobox. I think it will be better to use Creator like my diff shows, then they will not be displayed in the Issue-Category. Could you switch this? Thanks and Nog een prettige dag. ;) --Crazy1880 (talk) 10:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Crazy1880: looks like I made a copy & paste mistake in {{RCE-author}}. I corrected that and ran the bot again. Should be all fixed now. Thanks for pointing out. Multichill (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, yes, looks good --Crazy1880 (talk) 11:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something is not working[edit]

Hi! There is something after this edit Special:Diff/555269412 that makes the page crash. Perhaps you can have a look? --MGA73 (talk) 10:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, its the parameter "author" its too long. Perhaps this has to be shown in the parameter title? Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 11:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MGA73 and Crazy1880: User:Jarekt is working on Module:Artwork to do author parsing. I removed the code that is causing the template to explode. I'll collect some test cases in Category:Pages with script errors so we can improve the code. Multichill (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. (And yes the author is not used correctly on this example) --MGA73 (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Module_talk:Artwork#line_1485:_attempt_to_get_length_of_field_'?'_(a_nil_value). Multichill (talk) 11:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Geograph Update Bot now providing references with its SDC updates[edit]

Now that we have references in SDC, I've arranged for Geograph Update Bot, when updating an SDC statement, to also add a reference indicating that the information comes from Geograph. It follows the guidance at d:Help:Sources for referencing databases. For example, Special:Diff/623606324 is the bot's most recent SDC edit. I mention this in case you want to either suggest improvements or to adopt a similar scheme for GeographBot's uploads. --bjh21 (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bjh21: that looks nice. I'll see if I can update the upload bot to do the same. Multichill (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creator templates maintenance categories[edit]

Hi, Category:Creator templates without home category contains 1,161 pages. Category:Creator templates with Wikidata link: item missing linkback contains 276 pages. I emptied the later manually a few weeks ago, and it is a tedious work. Would it be possible to fix these with a bot? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: the instructions for Category:Creator templates with Wikidata link: item missing linkback are on that category. Jarek wrote that and might have some ideas. Multichill (talk) 20:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure it is possible to do with a bot, but the 3 step process outlined in the Category:Creator templates with Wikidata link: item missing linkback is quite quick. You touch every page, run this query and paste the results in QuickStatements. This "manual" process only takes minutes. Category:Creator templates without home category is more work. --Jarekt (talk) 02:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Multichill

Just for the form[edit]

schilderijen van UB Leiden[edit]

Quadro di Rubens[edit]

....... Adding structured data: date, copyright, source & author thanks a million..............how to thank a bot...............Multichill (great code)[edit]

Photo deletion question[edit]

Renaming file[edit]

License migration[edit]

follow the breadcrumbs of Php and say thanks for the work[edit]

File:US Navy 060201-N-5832A-004 An aircraft handler gets an F-14D Tomcat assigned to the Black Lions of Fighter Squadron two One three (VF-213) into position for launch.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Op deze manier blijft er weinig over[edit]

"Citation needed"[edit]

Thanks for the ping[edit]

Civility[edit]

Nizami 48[edit]

follow the digital breadcrumbs to say... great job, once again :Multichill[edit]

File:McEvoy.png[edit]

File:Wooler logo.GIF[edit]

a barnstar for you! :Schlurcher[edit]

Barnstar. Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata[edit]

Invitation to submit a session proposal to WikidataCon 2021 (deadline 20 October)[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Keller am Gräbelesberg im LSG Albstadt-Bitz (2019).jpg[edit]

How does BotMultichillT know botany?[edit]

Is BotMultichillT running properly at the moment?[edit]

Not adding all structured data[edit]

Medea-chart database on old nautical charts[edit]

File:Rex Whistler (1905-1944) - Lady Caroline Paget (1913–1976), Later Lady Duff - 1176330 - National Trust.jpg[edit]

Module:License[edit]

Category:Media_needing_category_review_in_use_at_da.wikipedia[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

GLAM and batch uploads[edit]

digital representation of (P6243)[edit]

Forgotten deletion requests[edit]

Adding main subject (P921) to media that already has both depicts (P180) and digital representation of (P6243) does not make any sense.[edit]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

questions about p6243[edit]

Discussion at administrator noticeboard about User:BotMultichillT[edit]

Essential singularity[edit]

File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, larger.jpeg[edit]

Vervangen van RCE categorie-suggesties?[edit]

author = Creator not Category[edit]

Something is not working[edit]

FYI: Geograph Update Bot now providing references with its SDC updates[edit]

Creator templates maintenance categories[edit]

Navigation menu

Search