User talk:GeorgHH

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Workshop zu Wikimedia und Katastrophenmanagement am 20.3. in Berlin[edit]

Hallo, wir organisieren für den 20.3.2018 einen Workshop, der dem Austausch von Wikimedianern mit Organisationen aus dem Bereich des Katastrophenmanagements dienen soll. Ziel ist es, auszuloten, wie wir unsere Wiki-basierten Aktivitäten besser mit den Aktivitäten anderer Akteure wie dem Roten Kreuz verzahnen können. Vielleicht ist das was für Dich? Bitte gib auch anderen Bescheid, die in diesem Bereich aktiv sind. Danke & Gruß, -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Furth Turm.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Furth Turm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Marion Beer (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hermit Crabs...[edit]

... are Anomurans, not Brachyurans. OM2003 (talk) 03:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sea nettles....[edit]

... are Semaeostomeans, not Rhizostomaeans. OM2003 (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Otto-Versand[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Otto-Versand has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Redarter (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACDC May2009 Hockenheim Germany (062).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ACDC May2009 Hockenheim Germany (062).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ralf Roletschek 19:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skulptur Hammer Park 002.jpg[edit]

Hammer Park oder doch nicht?

Moin, das Foto ist zwar schon einige Jahre alt, aber dennoch eine Frage dazu: Kann es sein, dass es nicht im Hammer Park, sondern woanders aufgenommen wurde? Ich hab die Skulptur dort nie gefunden, obwohl ich seit vielen Jahren fast täglich im Park unterwegs bin, und dachte bisher immer, sie sei schlicht zerstört oder entwendet worden. Jetzt stoße ich aber auf diese zwar nicht identische, aber doch sehr ähnliche Skulptur, die dort mit "Unterm Bismark Denkmal", also vermutlich im Alten Elbpark(?) lokalisiert wird. Kannst Du Dich vielleicht erinnern (oder in deinen Archiven nachforschen), wo Du das aufgenommen hast? :) --UweRohwedder (talk) 08:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, das Foto hab ich tatsächlich im Hammer Park aufgenommen. Es müsste irgendwo im Bereich der kleinen Anhöhe zwischen dem Kinderplanschbecken und den Tischtennisplatten, also Richtung Heckengarten, gewesen sein. Etwa da wo auch File:Skulptur Hammer Park 003.jpg steht. Ich kann mich noch erinnern das ich das Teil zum ersten mal sah nachdem in dem Bereich irgendwelche Umbau/Baumfällarbeiten stattfanden.
Vor Ort nachsehen kann ich leider nicht; inzwischen hat's mich in eine andere Großstadt verschlagen... GeorgHH • talk   21:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harburg Freudenberger05.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Harburg Freudenberger05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

HFGrupe (talk) 07:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tour de Ruhr[edit]

Hallo GeorgeHH, this category is not about a Television Series, but as the explanation says "Photo output of the Tour de Ruhr of the European Capital of Culture Ruhrgebiet for the Free Travel-Shirt on 20. February 2010". So it would be nice if you would remove your recent additions and create an own category to fit the Television series. --Wuselig (talk) 11:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images_from_KIT,_Voorstelling_Object_-_handschoenen[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Images_from_KIT,_Voorstelling_Object_-_handschoenen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ecritures (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dentro del pozo de agua.jpg[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH, was macht dich so sicher, dass der Brunnen in Spanien ist? lt. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/SNBACA stammen zumindest 3 der Bilder (von 5) des Users aus Mexiko. Wo man auch spanisch spricht. Ich weiß es auch nicht, daher halte ich das Verräumen nach Spanien für fragwürdig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, ich bin auch nicht sicher. Das Bild kann natürlich auch nur in die Hauptkategorie Brunnen sortiert werden. GeorgHH • talk   13:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Versehen oder verstecktes Merkmal?[edit]

Hallo Georg, du hast vor kurzem diese Datei kategorisiert File:Qudyalçay.jpg und der Stadt Qax zugeordnet. Wenn der Titel stimmt, dann passt das nicht. Andererseits könnte der Titel falsch sein, nur sehe ich nicht, woraus sich das schließen ließe. Schaust du dir das bitte noch mal an? VG Tozina (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, wie genau ich auf die Kategorie Qax kam, kann icht nicht mehr sagen. Hab jetzt noch mal geschaut, und gesehen das es die passende Category:Qudyalçay gibt. Danke für den Hinweis. GeorgHH • talk   21:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archives EFEO[edit]

Bonjour GeorgHH,

J'ai envoyé un mail au responsable de la photothèque des l'Ecole Française d'Extrême Orient. Ces photos ont bien plus de 70 ans donc en principe, elle rentre dans le domaine public, de plus, j'ai bien précisé que la provenance venait des archives EFEO. Je peux leur demander de façon pus proactive en leur téléphonant. Le fait de faire connaitre leur conservateur d'Angkor que ce soit Georges Trouvé ou Jean Commaille est plutôt bénéfique pour l'EFEO. Cela permet de faire connaitre l'action de l'EFEO au travers de ces hommes qui ont consacré leur vie à faire renaitre Angkor. Je peux faire en sorte d'obtenir des réponses de l'EFEO ? Qu'en penses-tu? Merci par avance pour ton retour, --Atalante88 (talk) 08:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Georg, I got in touch with the Curator of the Ecole Française d'Extrême Orient owner of those Pictures regarding the use of those Pix. Then, I precise that those pix are from the Archives of EFEO. Those Pix are more than 70 years old and in addition to that, Georges Trouve and Jean Commaille curators of Angkor Conservation are dead for more than 70 years. Showing their pix allows to illustrate not only the articles of those guys who dedicated their lives to the Angkor Conservation Revival but also the action of EFEO with its Curators of Angkor conservation. I am at your disposal for further discussion on this topic. --Atalante88 (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Atalante88, the decisive factor is the name of the photographer and when the photo was taken. the 70 year rule concerns the photographer, not the person who was photographed. if you provide a link to the EFEO page with corresponding information, the license status can be checked. GeorgHH • talk   11:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transportation_in_the_Philippines[edit]

Category discussion warning

Transportation in the Philippines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope photos[edit]

Hi. Thanks for nominating out of scope files for deletion, a number of which i actioned. In future you can tag them for speedy deletion using {{SD|F10}} - that will get it deleted almost immediately and you don't have to open a DR. Thanks once again Gbawden (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gbawden, thank you very much for your hint. I was not aware that unused personal files can now be speedy deleted. In the future I will use the {{SD}} tags, which of course makes more sense than unnecessarily overloading the deletion request page. Greetings. GeorgHH • talk   16:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brahms geburtshaus in Hamburg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Brahms geburtshaus in Hamburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

68.194.140.13 16:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GeorgHH&oldid=622857189"