Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Adopt Firefox
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Adopt FirefoxEdit
The educational value of these files is rather poor. Most are used on user talks only, some of them are not used at all. They're deletable as per COM:EDUSE and COM:INUSE ('"that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope.").
- File:Adoptfirefox-ar.jpg, only on bot page
- File:Adoptfirefox-de.jpg, not in use
- File:Adoptfirefox-de.png, userpage only
- File:Adoptfirefox-es.jpg, userpage & commons cat page
- File:Adoptfirefox-fr.jpg, userpage & commons cat page
- File:Adoptfirefox-it.jpg, bot page & commons cat page
- File:Adoptfirefox-pt.png, userpage & commons cat page
- File:Adoptfirefox-sv.jpg, commons cat page only
- File:Adoptfirefox.jpg, may be kept (high use)
- File:Firefox-Vectorized.svg, userpage only
- File:Pilnofairfyks-jbo.png, not in use
Rezonansowy (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep most of thes files are used by users in their page. Firefox is a part of the "open" Wikipedian culture--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)- Keep, the pt-version is also INUSE on an ordinary page, other versions not checked. –Be..anyone (talk) 16:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep like those before me and because the author (Shari Chankhamma) is cited in various pages of wikipedia --Luigi.tuby (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Per in use argument, and also most of these files survived previous DRs (OTRS permission). --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment OTRS DR is about the license of file, but not this matter (it's useless). Besides 2 files are not in use and several are only on user talk pages. There's also the argument from COM:INUSE, "that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." I suggest to delete not used files and these from user talk pages as per this argument. I changed my rationale to these arguments. --Rezonansowy (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Images in scope, several in use and educational about Firefox and the open source culture. Also, in my view, if one language version is in use and so in scope, so automatically all other languages versions and the original source are in scope. Tm (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Tm: These all files are used at least on Commons topic page, which isn't enough IMO. None is used on any Wikipedia article. --Rezonansowy (talk) 08:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Quoting you "None is used on any Wikipedia article". None is not in use in three articles in three difeent languages:
- @Tm: These all files are used at least on Commons topic page, which isn't enough IMO. None is used on any Wikipedia article. --Rezonansowy (talk) 08:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Pilnofairfyks-jbo.png in [1] File:Adoptfirefox-fr.jpg in [2] File:Adoptfirefox-pt.jpg in [3].
So if three language versions are in use in wikipedia articles, all others are in scope and with educational use. Tm (talk) 10:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously in scope because they are in use. Furthermore, showing the advantages of using free software (as well as other kinds of software or other attitudes reputed good) is educative.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)