Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
46,848 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 41,845 (89.3%) 
Undecided
  
 2,664 (5.7%) 
Declined
  
 2,339 (5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Aiguille du Fruit and Côte Brune chairlift.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
DimiTalen on 2022-01-20 06:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Winter view of Aiguille du Fruit (3048 m) from the southwest
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Humblefly-2.jpg
View
Nominated by:
Dimljacic (talk) on 2022-01-22 15:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Bombylius major (great bee-fly) male underside

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a promoted image in VI. The scope could be modified by attaching it to the category and focusing it on the underside of the animal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your advice. --Dimljacic (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think this is underside Archaeodontosaurus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For this species it is very difficult to see the underside except on specimens. We cannot claim more. There are only 3 images in the category that show it in the same condition; this seems very acceptable to me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with Archaeodontosaurus. Although this is not literally a picture of its underside, it can be seen quite decently, having in mind size of the animal itself (around 6-12 mm/0.23-0.46 in). --Dimljacic (talk) 11:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Adam-Opel-Statue, Detail (2008-08-28).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-23 11:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of Adam Opel memorial in Rüsselsheim by Emil Hub, view from southeast
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image would be the best image for a scope of this statue. Better than a cropped image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But the scope says "Detail ...". In this image it's interesting (IMHO) that the name OPEL is visible in the background. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Palauenc05. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hynobius fossigenus.png
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lupe (talk) on 2022-01-24 19:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Hynobius fossigenus ("Japanese Rift Salamander") male holotype
  • Lupe, can different species within this genus be visually distinguished? If so, please nominate this in the scope of its species if the species doesn't already have a VI. Also, the English vernacular name should be included in parentheses at the end of your scope in regular text. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
scope changed to species and vernacular name added (only Japanese since it's endemic to Japan) --Lupe (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like to insist on English, but I didn't create the guidelines you can see at Commons:Valued image scope#Animals. Please have a look there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did and like I said this species doesn't have an english vernacular name. Thank you Lupe (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
w:Hynobius has "Asian salamander" as an English vernacular name for the genus; https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/738159-Hynobius-fossigenus has "Japanese Rift Salamander" for this species, accompanied by this photo! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
alright, but I put in quotation marks since it's just from some webpage. The species was first described in 2018 here. That's also where the image is from --Lupe (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Image is too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe, but still useful. Lupe, I hope you don't mind that I changed the style of the quotation marks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think we can expect this to be lightened and less over-saturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Hemilienardia malleti 01.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2022-01-25 06:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Hemilienardia malleti, shell
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
NSU Ro 80, Bj. 1976, Front (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-25 08:23 (UTC)
Scope:
NSU Ro 80, built in 1976, with “Fuchsfelgen” (brand of wheels), front and right side
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Triumph 1800 Roadster, Notsitz (Sp).JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-25 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Opening the Rumble seat of a Triumph 1800 Roadster from 1948
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Gespietste kastanje 13-01-2022. (d.j.b).jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2022-01-25 16:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Half of an impaled chestnut found on a forest trail.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
NSU Ro 80, Bj. 76, Motor (Sp).JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-25 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Engine compartment of NSU Ro 80, view from left side
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Small stately bush brown (Bicyclus evadne elionas) male underside.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-25 22:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Bicyclus evadne elionas (Small stately bush brown) male underside
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Dusky evening brown (Gnophodes chelys) underside.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-25 22:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Gnophodes chelys (Dusky evening brown) underside
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Light bush brown (Bicyclus dorothea) underside.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-25 22:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Bicyclus dorothea (Light bush brown) underside
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
10 Woods End Road Lincoln MA.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
—Percival Kestreltail (talk) on 2022-01-26 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
10 Woods End Road, Lincoln, Massachusetts
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I still think this is best in scope, because it more nearly shows the full extent of the house. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Hattem, kanon. 13-09-2021. (actm.) 01.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2022-01-26 05:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Hattem, cannon on the Schipperswal.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
(Toulouse) Tête d'homme - Musée des Augustins - RA 847 Bis.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-26 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Tête d'homme, Musée des Augustins Toulouse - RA 847 Bis
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
(Toulouse) Mère et fille - Théodule Ribot - Glasgow. The Burrell Collection UK. Don de Sir William and Lady Burell, 1944.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-26 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Mère et fille ( Mother and daughter) by Augustin Théodule Ribot
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Cechenena minor MHNT CUT 2010 0 496 Bhimtal, Uttarakhand, India female ventral.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-26 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Cechenena minor specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Helix lucorum var. boettgeri 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2022-01-26 07:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Helix lucorum var. boettgeri, shell
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
View Mandraki from the north-west. Nisyros, Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ввласенко (talk) on 2022-01-26 07:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Mandraki. View from the north-west

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Triumph 1800 Roadster, Bj. 1948, Heck (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-26 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Rear and right side of Triumph 1800 Roadster, built in 1948
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed 64.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2022-01-26 16:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Schokland UNESCO World Heritage. Museum Schokland. Highest water levels at the storm disasters in 1825 and 1916.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Scalloped yellow glider (Cymothoe fumana fumana) female underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-26 17:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cymothoe fumana fumana (Scalloped yellow glider) female underside
Open for review.
Oberthür's pathfinder (Catuna oberthueri).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-26 17:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Catuna oberthueri (Oberthür's pathfinder) dorsal
Open for review.
Common missile (Meza meza) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-26 17:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Meza meza (Common missile) underside
Open for review.
LEVC VN5 Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0299.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-26 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
LEVC VN5 - left rear view
Used in:
en:LEVC VN5

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Maybach Spezialrennwagen (1920) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0145.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-26 19:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Maybach automobiles - Spezialrennwagen
Open for review.
Mercedes-Benz 280SE 3.5 (W111C) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0294.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-26 20:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz 280SE 3.5 (W111C) - coupe - right front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz-Pkw, de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 111
Open for review.
Kampen, Koornmarktspoort. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2022-01-27 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Kampen, Koornmarktspoort.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The correct category for the scope is : Buitenzijde Koornmarktspoort‎ --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
(Lavaur) Le Héraut - Henri Rachou - 68.5x61.5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-27 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Le Héraut ( The herald) by Henri Rachou
Open for review.
(Toulouse) Nymphe (1857) Gabriel Durand Musée du vieux Toulouse inv.T1934.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-27 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Nymphe (Nymph) by Gabriel Durand
Open for review.
Isognathus rimosa rimosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 497 Mexico male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-27 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Isognathus rimosa rimosa specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Mactra stultorum var. atlantica 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2022-01-27 06:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Mactra stultorum var. atlantica ( Rayed Trough Shell), left valve
Open for review.
Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (d.j.b.) 17.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2022-01-27 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Terp (Hegebeintum): Memorial plaque in the road to the church of Maria Johanna van Nijsten (1672-1672). Child of Bartholomeus van Nijsten and Margaretha Huygh.
Open for review.
Porsche 356 A Speedster mit Hardtop (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-27 18:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Porsche 356 A Speedster with hardtop, front and left side

Symbol support vote.svg Support Quite rare with hardtop, the other comparable pictures have issues like distracting backgrounds. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Mercedes-Benz 300 SE (W112) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0078.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-27 19:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz 300 SE (W112)- right front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 112, et:Mercedes-Benzi S-klass, fr:Mercedes-Benz Classe S
Open for review.
Leipzig Jägerhof Eingang.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2022-01-27 22:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Entrance to Jägerhof in Leipzig, Germany.
Used in:
Jägerhof Leipzig
Open for review.
Kampen, Ikonenmuseum. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2022-01-28 05:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Relief above the door of the Icon Museum.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your comment. Question: I had used the, because that is the building in question. Which category should I use?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support perfect now. (The right strategy is to place the image where it is most prominent and easy to find.) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
(Lavaur) Projet de menu - Henri Rachou - Dessin à l'encre 32x22.5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-28 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Projet de menu (Menu project) by Henri Rachou

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
(Toulouse) Musée des Augustins - Adoration des Mages - STOMER Mathias - Joconde05620001277.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-28 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Adoration des Mages (Adoration of the Magi) by STOMER Mathias Musée des Augustins, de Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Isognathus rimosa rimosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 497 Mexico male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-28 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Isognathus rimosa rimosa specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Eucithara coronata 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2022-01-28 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Eucithara coronata, shell, brown form
Open for review.
Abarth Osella PA 1, Bj. 1973 (2011-08-13 Sp B),.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-28 16:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Abarth Osella PA 1 from 1973, front and left side
Open for review.
Hattem, kunstwerk van Elisabeth Varga. 13-09-2021. (actm.).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2022-01-28 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Hattem, artwork by Elisabeth Varga in the city park.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Blue red eye (Pteroteinon laufella).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-28 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Pteroteinon laufella (Blue red eye) underside
Open for review.
Branded large fox (Rhabdomantis galatia) male 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-28 17:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhabdomantis galatia (Branded large fox) male dorsal
Open for review.
Blue policeman (Coeliades chalybe chalybe).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-28 17:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Coeliades chalybe chalybe (Blue policeman) underside
Open for review.
Klokkenstoel Akmarijp. (d.j.b.) 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2022-01-28 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden bell tower, Akmarijp Bell chair on the cemetery in Akmarijp.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Mercedes-Benz W201 190 E 3.2 AMG Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0108.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-28 18:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz W201 - 3.2 AMG - right front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz W 201
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
NSU Brixner Spyder Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0262.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-28 19:29 (UTC)
Scope:
NSU racing cars Brixner
Open for review.
Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 88.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2022-01-29 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Schokland UNESCO World Heritage. Museum Schokland. Plaque with the Royal Decree of William III to clear the island of Schokland in 1859.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
(Toulouse) La Lecture de la bible - Théodule Ribot - Bordeaux, musée des beaux-arts.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-29 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
La Lecture de la bible (Reading the Bible) by Augustin Théodule Ribot

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
(Lavaur) La République militante - Henri Rachou - HsT 31.5x22..jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-29 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
La République militante (The militant Republic) by Henri Rachou
Open for review.
Isognathus rimosa rimosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 497 Miramar, Havana female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-29 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Isognathus rimosa rimosa specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Etrema trigonostoma 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2022-01-29 06:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Etrema trigonostoma, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Tecno, Bj. 1972 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-29 12:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Tecno PA123 from 1972, left side, on Nürburgring in 2011

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Maserati V8 RI, Bj. 1935 (2011-08-13) 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-01-29 12:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Maserati V8RI from 1935, front and left side

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud I Empress Saloon Hooper ALC5 (1957) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0249.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-29 12:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud by Hooper - left front view
Used in:
de:Hooper Empress Line
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and a really beautiful car. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Rover 14 P1 sports open two-seater (1936) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0143.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-29 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Rover 14 P1 sports open two-seater - left front view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Talbot-Lago T120 Graber (1936) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0040.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-29 13:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Talbot-Lago by Hermann Graber - T120- right front view
Used in:
de:Carrosserie Graber

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Tatra 75 Bohemia Cabriolet (1935) Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0139.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2022-01-29 13:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tatra 75 - Bohemia - left front view
Used in:
fi:Tatra T75
Reason:
It's unlikely to get a better shot of this model anytime soon, since only 2 Bohemia were produced.[1] -- Alexander-93 (talk)
Open for review.
Bouvier's elfin (Sarangesa bouvieri) male.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-28 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarangesa bouvieri (Bouvier's elfin) male dorsal
Open for review.
Volta ciliate blue (Cupidesthes lithas) underside.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-28 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Cupidesthes lithas (Volta ciliate blue) underside
Open for review.
Western marble (Falcuna leonensis) underside.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-29 14:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Falcuna leonensis (Western marble) underside
Open for review.
Nederlands Hervormde Kerk Tsjerkepole 7 Terkaple (d.j.b.) 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2022-01-29 17:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Nederlands Hervormde Kerk (Terkaple) Entrance portal with gable stones.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Ambassade du Brésil en France, 34 cours Albert-Ier, Paris 8e 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2022-01-29 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Brazilian Embassy, Paris
Open for review.
Kampen, Sculpture De Lantaarndrager. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2022-01-30 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Kampen Sculpture " The Lantern Bearer " Artwork by Thomas Rodr.
Open for review.
(Toulouse) Etude de femme - Théodule Ribot - Musée Baron Gérard.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-30 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Etude de femme (Study of a woman) by Augustin Théodule Ribot

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Category Face-smile.svg --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
(Lavaur) Composition au paravent japonais, coffre et sculpture médiévale, 1923 - Henri Rachou 82x62.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-30 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Composition au paravent japonais, coffre et sculpture médiévale (Composition with Japanese screen, chest and medieval sculpture) by Henri Rachou

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.
Isognathus rimosa rimosa MHNT CUT 2010 0 497 Miramar, Havana female ventral.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-01-30 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Isognathus rimosa rimosa specimen female ventral
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside[edit]

   
African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-11-15 23:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 02:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside Principe 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) underside

Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better indeed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Messier 45 - Pleiades star cluster[edit]

   
Pleiades large.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-21 13:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Messier 45 - Pleiades star cluster
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fulfills relevant criteria. Lycaon (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: 0
2. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: Declined.
File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per my remarks on the suggested replacement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Pleiades large.png
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ToBeFree (talk) on 2022-01-08 23:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Messier 45 – Pleiades star cluster
Reason:
The original file is a 49.1 MiB TIFF ([2]). I have downloaded it and converted it to a lossless PNG using imagemagick. The current Valued Image (.jpg) was promoted 31 December 2008 (1.99 MB JPEG). Recompressing to a quality-100 JPEG, however, takes over 20MiB, and even this isn't lossless. So the current Valued Image is a very lossy JPEG that can be replaced by this lossless PNG. -- ToBeFree (talk)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The JPG is slightly but noticeably sharper at review size. I don't understand why I can't edit its entry here to support, but considering that this is VIC, how lossy an image is when viewed at larger sizes is irrelevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Dimorphic or Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female dorsal[edit]

   
Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa (Lycoa acraea) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The greater part of the butterfly is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course it is not a perfect image. Still valuable for identifying the species. Remember, I could say for many VIs of views: 'The greater part of the xxx is not visible' Charles (talk) 10:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think images with basic technical defects should not receive any awards. VI is not QI, but there are some borders of quality that should be taken into account when evaluating images. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image is not of a landscape or immobile building. Charles (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol support vote.svg Support This may have a sharpness issue, but it's the best we have currently. I don't think the sharpness issue is damaging to the EV too much either. The butterfly is still clearly and easily identifiable. lNeverCry 18:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-17 20:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa lycoa (Dimorphic acraea) female dorsal
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope) male dorsal[edit]

   
Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-11-29 13:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea alciope (Hewitson's acraea) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hewitson’s acraea (Acraea alciope) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-17 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea alciope (Hewitson’s acraea) male dorsal
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus[edit]

   
Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-05-19 09:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus (Large fairy hairstreak) male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-18 21:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus (Large fairy hairstreak) male underside
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus)[edit]

   
White-tipped blue (Eicochrysops hippocrates) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-05-22 16:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Thermoniphas micylus (Common chalk blue) ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus micylus) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-18 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Thermoniphas micylus micylus (Common chalk blue) underside
Reason:
previous VI incorrect id -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi)[edit]

   
Common bush blue (Cacyreus lingeus) underside Principe.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 11:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Cacyreus audeoudi (Bright bush blue) underside
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-19 14:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cacyreus audeoudi (Bright bush blue) underside
Reason:
id of existing VI incorrect. Apologies. -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 13:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

VIC Submission[edit]

   
Gentrification with an old and a new home side by side in Old East Dallas.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Matthew T Rader (talk) on 2022-01-27 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Gentrification In Old East Dallas
Used in:
en:House, en:Gentrification, en:Old East Dallas, Dallas, en:Gentrification in the United States, es:Casa, ja:住宅
Open for review.


To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=577180965"