Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
---|---|
Request completed | |
Confirmed | Likely |
Possilikely | Possible |
Unlikely | Inconclusive |
Unrelated | Stale |
Request declined | |
Declined | Checkuser is not for fishing |
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
It looks like a duck to me | Checkuser is not a crystal ball. |
Information | |
Additional information needed | Deferred to |
Doing… | Info |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard.
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests[edit]
BenjaminD72[edit]
- BenjaminD72 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- WolfgangP66 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: Suspected paid edit/spamming, well hidden. Exactly the same behavior: Uploading 3 photographs (as far as I see no copyvios), than creating a user page calling themselves amateur photographers and adding a spam link to a (different ones!) divorce lawyer. --Achim55 (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Yuiyui2001[edit]
- Yuiyui2001 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Gilas Pilipinas GT500 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Taegeuk Warriors GT500 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: Block evasion, updating just the same images uploaded by previous accounts. --Achim55 (talk) 17:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives