Commons:Quality images candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Translate this page
Shortcut
↓ Skip to nominations ↓
Other languages:
Quality images logo.svg

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. Please note that this is not the same thing as featured pictures. Additionally, if you just want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose[edit]

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.


Guidelines[edit]

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators[edit]

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements[edit]
  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements[edit]

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value[edit]

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate[edit]

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations[edit]

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images[edit]

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review[edit]

How to update the status

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

  • If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion[edit]

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

  1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
  2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
  3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2022.
  4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

  1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2022.
  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 30 2022 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules[edit]

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with: 

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 14:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms


January 30, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Aerial view over Cappadocia, nearby Gorëme, Turkey. By User:Gsahin17 --IamMM 14:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Pair of Indian cormorants (Phalacrocorax fuscicollis) in nest on dead tree, Kabini Reservoir, Karnataka --Tagooty 13:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Indian cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscicollis) sunning on dead tree in the Kabini Reservoir, Karnataka --Tagooty 13:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination The Katzenbuckel in the Odenwald, seen from the east --Milseburg 12:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Windows in house in Serpukhov, Moscow region, Russia --Никонико962 12:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Val Thorens from Pointe de la Masse, France. --DimiTalen 12:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Saint Segolene church in Soual, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Sunflowers cultivated in Saint-Avit, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Saint John the Baptist church in Cambounet-sur-le-Sor, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Latingma. --RockyMasum 10:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Flood 2022 near Rattelsdorf --Ermell 10:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Flood 2022 near Rattelsdorf --Ermell 10:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Flood 2022 near Rattelsdorf --Ermell 10:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Flood 2022 near Rattelsdorf --Ermell 10:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review I suggest, lighten up the very dark parts. --Milseburg 13:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Flood 2022 near Rattelsdorf --Ermell 10:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Roofing in shopping street at the crossing of Marktstraße / Kieler Straße in Wilhelmshaven --Tuxyso 09:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Taganrog. Station "Taganrog-2" --Alexxx1979 09:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Suzdal. Kamenka River --Alexxx1979 09:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Soča river near Kamno, Kobarid municipality, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Na Vrhu, Starijski Vrh and Baba seen from Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Pirhovec, Veliki Vrh and Krasji Vrh seen from Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Hiking sign in Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Road D203 near Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Shopping street Kielerstraße in Wilhelmshaven --Tuxyso 09:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination View from an old window with spider webs to the outside (Wangerland, Lower Saxony) --Tuxyso 08:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Severanya Skazka on the Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 08:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination A. S. Pushkin on the Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 08:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Vysotsky Monastery from Nara River --Mike1979 Russia 08:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline
      Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 10:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination St Nicholas Church Vladimir --Mike1979 Russia 08:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Golden Gate Vladimir --Mike1979 Russia 08:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      The spots in the sky should be removed IMO. --Ermell 10:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Eclectic mansion, Rue de la République 46, Comines (France) --Velvet 07:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Houses, Avenue de Versailles 32 & 30, Comines (France) --Velvet 07:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Seed pod of a Phlomis. Focus stack of 44 photos.
      --Famberhorst 07:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --IamMM 07:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Shell of a Burgundy snail, Helix pomatia var. transsylvanica --Llez 06:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Weir of the Watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Millstone (as table) at the watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Lens ball in the game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Villa Edelweiss on Hauptstraße #108 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Pier at the Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Entrance gate of the Lieleg manor house on Hauptstraße #102 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Pier at the Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Reed bed with typha latifolia of «Edelweiß bath» on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Pablo Neruda bust. Santiago. Chile. --Rjcastillo 02:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Retrato Francisco García de Huidobro --Rjcastillo 01:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Alexander Schlager, goalkeeper of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Alexander Schlager, goalkeeper of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Manuel Thurnwald, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Manuel Thurnwald, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Manuel Thurnwald, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 29, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Sailboat in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 00:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination A red rose in the civil parish of Great Waltham, Essex, England--Etoza 23:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 23:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Echte Kamille (Matricaria chamomilla) im Freilichtmuseum Roscheider Hof. Standort: Brachfläche um die RAD-Baracke herum.--Etoza 23:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline Lack of detail --Cvmontuy 12:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Winter scenery along Klamath Strait Drain at the Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge in Siskiyou County, California. In the background Mount McLoughlin in Oregon. --Frank Schulenburg 23:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Monumental Lettes, Palenque, Chiapas, México, 2021 --Cvmontuy 22:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: National Museum of Natural History of Chile --Rjcastillo 22:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Bell tower of the St Quentin church in Appelle, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 22:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Saint Peter church in Cambon-les-Lavaur, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 22:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Bell tower of the Our Lady of the Assumption church in Auvezines, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 22:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Paris Ier eglise St-Germain-Auxerrois retable flamand (by Mbzt) --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Palmetum of Santa Cruz de Tenerife --Mike Peel 19:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline
      Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 22:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination View of Torres de Santa Cruz in Santa Cruz de Tenerife --Mike Peel 19:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination View of Torres de Santa Cruz in Santa Cruz de Tenerife --Mike Peel 19:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Female Zygiella x-notata --Alexis Lours 17:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination View from the Luitpold Bridge near Oberhausen upstream over the Nahe --Milseburg 12:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Mannequin in Jack Wolfskin clothing at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 12:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Trabant 600 at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 12:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Sunseeker yacht in Wasahamnen, Stockholm --MB-one 12:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Beach of Hooksiel (Wangerland) with big wheel just before a storm --Tuxyso 11:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Good image but currently undercategorized --MB-one 12:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      ✓ Done please take another look. --Tuxyso 16:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)}
      Symbol support vote.svg Support QI now --MB-one 19:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Museum harbour in Carolinensiel district of Wittmund --Tuxyso 11:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Building of Hof von Oldenburg at street Alten Markt 14 in Jever --Tuxyso 10:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Beginning of the street Schlachterstraße in Jever with historical building Haus der Getreuen --Tuxyso 09:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Tomb of Zain-ul-Abedin's mother at Zaina Kadal in Srinagar. By User:N. Rayan --Hulged 09:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline Perspective correction is necessary and odd cut in the foreground. --Tuxyso 11:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: View of one of the smaller domes built around the (larger) main dome. By User:N. Rayan --Hulged 09:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Hari Parbat Fort, Srinagar. By User:Shibnaths2 --Hulged 09:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline Strange overall color rendering, remarkable halos in the sky, details lost (probably due to massive image pre-processing of your smartphone) --Tuxyso 11:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Friesisches Brauhaus in Jever, subsidiary building of the Jever Brewery --Tuxyso 09:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Suzdal. Kamenka River. Church of Elijah the Prophet --Alexxx1979 09:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really striking photo, a possible FP in spite of not being twice as large, but alas, I have the feeling that the greens are oversaturated and the water is too green. What do you think, Alexxx1979? -- Ikan Kekek 14:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Saint Petersburg. Russian Railway Museum. Diesel Locomotive and Power Generator TGe-016 --Alexxx1979 09:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. @XRay: Please correct redlink "Haltern am See photographs taken on 2022-01-28" --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      My bot is working. It will be done in a few minutes. --XRay 09:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Weir of the Watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Weir of the Watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Weir of the Watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Water whell of the watermill in Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 09:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Theatre stage and props in Beihai Park in Beijing --Ermell 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 09:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Temple in Beihai Park in Beijing --Ermell 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 09:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Temple in Beihai Park in Beijing --Ermell 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 09:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Five Dragons Pavilion at Beihai Park in Beijing --Ermell 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Five Dragons Pavilion at Beihai Park in Beijing --Ermell 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Eclectic mansion, Rue de la République 28, Comines (France) --Velvet 08:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Eclectic mansion, Avenue de Versailles 14, Comines (France) --Velvet 08:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Lucca / Toscana - Backside of Cattedrale di San Martino --Imehling 08:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Lucca / Toscana - Piazza Anfiteatro --Imehling 08:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: View Gyali island from Nisyros. Greece --Ввласенко 07:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Pumice mining on Gyali island. Greece --Ввласенко 07:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Bled Island in Bled, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Bell tower of the Salvator church in Nova Gorica, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion QI for me. --Tuxyso 11:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Salvator church in Nova Gorica, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Assumption of Mary parish church Tolmin, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Bell tower of the Assumption of Mary parish church Tolmin, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Too dark for me. Could you increase brightness? --Tuxyso 11:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      ✓ Done. --Tournasol7 14:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Kampen, New Tower on Old Street. (Detail)
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      The sky is a bit too noisy. Can you check it, please? --Tournasol7 05:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      ✓ Done. Noise reduction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality now, thank you! --Tournasol7 09:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Water trough on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Hiking trail on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Disused farmstead «Gimplhof» on Quellweg #38 at Winklerner Alm, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Good quality, but one sensor spot in the sky, mid-left. --Tagooty 04:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      ✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Sensor spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Guest house «Hörmann» on Gaisrückenstraße #57 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      A few sensor spots. May look better if the bottom foreground is cropped? --Tagooty 04:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      ✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Foreground was cropped and sensor spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Restaurant «Zocklwirt», vulgo Rumasch, Gaisrückenstraße #77 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Good quality. Faint sensor spot at left (see note). --Tagooty 04:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)< /br>✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Sensor spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Anyphaena accentuata on a fence --Alexis Lours 00:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Steatoda nobilis --Alexis Lours 00:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Arnel Jakupovic, Alexander Schlager and Sascha Horvath, players of Austria U21 carrying a football goal. --Steindy 00:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 28, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Rhine–Lafayette Pedestrian Overpass, Portland, Oregon --Another Believer 04:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Original Hotcake House, Portland, Oregon --Another Believer 04:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Gideon Overcrossing, Portland, Oregon --Another Believer 04:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Mt. Angel Pioneer Cemetery, Oregon, U.S. --Another Believer 04:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Mount Angel Abbey, Saint Benedict, Oregon --Another Believer 04:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Town hall of Saint-Agnan, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 23:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Our Lady of the Assumption church in Garrigues, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 23:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Salvator church in Marzens, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 23:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Saint Hilarius church in Pratviel, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 23:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Saint Andrew church in Saint-André in commune of Magrin, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 23:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Interior of a Regal LS4C at Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 22:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Interior of a Renault Type NN Torpedo from 1927 at Classic-Gals Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 20:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Tea plantation of factory Chá Porto Formoso --Nino Verde 20:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Tea plantation of factory Chá Porto Formoso --Nino Verde 20:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Tea plantation of factory Chá Porto Formoso --Nino Verde 20:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Tea plantation of factory Chá Porto Formoso --Nino Verde 20:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination View to the tea flower on the tea bush --Nino Verde 20:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Statue of Adjona, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Statue of Bencomo, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Statue of Beneharo, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Statue of Pelinor, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Fuente de los Peregrinos, Candelaria, Tenerife --Mike Peel 18:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis) --Charlesjsharp 17:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Cayman curly-tailed lizard (Leiocephalus varius) --Charlesjsharp 17:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Koppie foam grasshopper (Dictyophorus spumans spumans) --Charlesjsharp 17:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination A common kestrel perched on a tree. --Alexis Lours 16:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination A green woodpecker perched on a birch tree. --Alexis Lours 16:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination A green woodpecker perched on a birch tree. --Alexis Lours 16:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination A feral pigeon walking on grass. --Alexis Lours 16:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination A male Eurasian wren singing. --Alexis Lours 16:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Lifebuo in Norway --Bep 15:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Walk in the countryside of Torri - Rignano sull'Arno --PROPOLI87 12:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline
      Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry! Strong overprocessed. --Steindy 18:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Eclectic mansion, Rue du Pont 2, Comines (France) --Velvet 12:45, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Eclectic mansion, Rue du Château 1, Comines (France) --Velvet 12:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Buddhist temple in Old Bagan, Irrawaddy River. --Argenberg 12:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review Good quality. It would be interesting to have coordinates here. --Milseburg 12:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Floating gardens on Inle Lake, Shan State, Myanmar. --Argenberg 12:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: The shores of Taungthaman Lake, Amarapura, Mandalay. --Argenberg 12:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Window in the All Saints Church, Ivanovskoye, Russia --Никонико962 11:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Seventeen arches bridge in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Building at Yonghe Temple in Beijing --Ermell 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Passenger ferry on Kunming Lake at the Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. Jetzt holst du die alten Bilder heraus. --Milseburg 12:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Passenger ferry on Kunming Lake at the Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Cyclists in Beijing --Ermell 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: A 6 mm long shelt of a Mangeliid, Eucithara coronata --Llez 07:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review I'm looking at these and they don't seem all that sharp to me. What's going on with the focus? They certainly don't look up to your normal standard.--Peulle 07:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
      Pictogram voting info.svg Info As the shell is omly 6mm long, I made i not with a normal camera but by using a microscope with an [UCMOS 14000 KPA]-Camera (as in all shells that are below 7-8 mm) --Llez 07:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Livorno, Toscana - Fortezza Vecchia --Imehling 07:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Lucca / Toscana - Campanile of Cattedrale di San Martino --Imehling 07:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Bell tower of the church Issódia tis Theotókou. Nikia, Nisyros, Greece --Ввласенко 06:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Interior of Church Issódia tis Theotókou. Nikia, Nisyros, Greece --Ввласенко 06:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Rybachy and Sredny Peninsulas. By User:Vasily Iakovlev --IamMM 05:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Large file, but I have to reduce it to 50% to get it to be fairly sharp in the nearer reaches on my 13-inch monitor. -- Ikan Kekek 11:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Hattem, Grote of Andreaskerk. church tower, (Detail).
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Capitol Building of the U.S. State of Utah. --GyozaDumpling 05:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality,and I think those three spots at the right part are birds --Michielverbeek 06:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Soča river near Kamno, Kobarid municipality, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 04:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Gregorčičeva ulica 20 in Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 04:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination View of the town hall of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 04:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Building at Gregorčičeva ulica 20 in Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 04:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination View of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 04:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Farmstead vulgo Komar on Gaisrückenstraße #51 in Winklern Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Fallen tree and former beehive hut on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Residential building on Gaisrückenstrasse #55 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Philipp Malicsek, player of Austria U21 --Steindy 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Philipp Malicsek, player of Austria U21 --Steindy 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21 --Steindy 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21 --Steindy 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 27, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination View of Chica Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 21:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline
      Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry! The whole photo looks tilted. --Steindy 23:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
      check again, Steindy --Ezarate 23:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Avenue Peralta Ramos, way of Provincial Route 11, in Cabo Corrientes, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 21:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline
      Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry! All lamps have CAs. --Steindy 23:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
      check again, please @Steindy: --Ezarate 23:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Old roof hatch in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 19:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Cultural heritage monument of a multiple dwelling from the backside in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 19:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Obviously a recalcitrant motive. I don't know how this could be photographed better. --Milseburg 12:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Port of Viareggio / Toscana --Imehling 17:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Please check the verticals. --Ermell 17:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done--Imehling 10:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Lucca / Toscana - Front of Basilica di San Frediano --Imehling 17:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 21:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)✓ Done--Imehling 10:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Laboratorio de Energía Solar Termoeléctrica, El Medano, Tenerife --Mike Peel 14:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --IamMM 14:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Enan by Luis Morera, Plaza de La Alameda in Santa Cruz de La Palma --Mike Peel 14:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Church of the Holy Intercession through the loophole of Chortkiv Castle --Максим Огородник 13:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      CA should be removed and the noise reduced. --Ermell 14:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Thalasseus bergii - Greater Crested Tern on Penguin Island in Shoalwater Marine Park, washing itself -Gnangarra 13:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline
      Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not sharp --Charlesjsharp 16:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Thalasseus bergii - Greater Crested Tern on Penguin Island in Shoalwater Marine Park --Gnangarra 13:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      CA should be removed --Ermell 14:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Street furniture in a newly constructed area of Munich-Obermenzing - bicycle racks with caution tape --Kritzolina 12:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Passenger ferry on Kunming Lake at the Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 08:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Building on Suzhou Street in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 08:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Bridge to Suzhou Street in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 08:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Saint Stephen church in Belcastel, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Paris II place de la Bourse (by Mbzt) --Sebring12Hrs 07:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Paris st nicolas des champs (by (Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 07:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Pioneer Park, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 05:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Courthouse (UTA station), Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 05:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Triad Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 05:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Devereaux House, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 05:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: The Gateway (Salt Lake City), Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 05:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Eberspächer Luge World Cup Oberhof: Trinity Solace Ellis (CAN). By --Stepro 00:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Marko Kvasina, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Philip Malicsek, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Philip Malicsek, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 26, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination TWSBI Eco fountain pen – coral – without top --Augustgeyler 18:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 20:28, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: San Pedro Apóstol Parish, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico --Another Believer 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: San Pedro Apóstol Parish, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico --Another Believer 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Cholula, Puebla, Mexico --Another Believer 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: View of Goteik Valley and Goteik Viaduct, Shan, Myanmar. --Argenberg 15:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Tadmur Castle in Palmyra, 13th century, Syria. --Argenberg 15:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 20:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Eberspächer Luge World Cup Oberhof: Sigita Berzina (LAT). By --Stepro 12:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Flying display of an Airbus A350-1041 at Paris Air Show June 2019 --MB-one 12:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 20:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Porsche 911 Carrera RS (type 964) at Techno-Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 12:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 20:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Saint-Chrysole Church of Comines (France) --Velvet 11:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Overview of the east wing of Schiller gymnasium in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Overview of the west wing of Schiller gymnasium in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Extension building of Schiller gymnasium in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Discarded FFP2 mask in Munich --Kritzolina 10:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus micylus) --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Former blacksmith's shop in Großheirat --Ermell 08:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Protected urban ensemble in Brazil. By User:Fwsbsb --IamMM 08:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Portal of the Saint Bartholomew church in Lacroisille, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 03:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Marko Kvasin, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 25, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Utah State Capitol Grounds and Capitol Complex, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 02:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review Left part is hanging to the right --Michielverbeek 06:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Lions (Utah State Capitol), Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 02:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Purple CA, perspective correction. Pl. add a Description of the main subject. --Tagooty 06:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Pagoda (Memory Grove), Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 02:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Courthouse (UTA station), Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 02:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Jaguar XJ220 at Techno Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 13:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: East facade of the west wing of Schiller Gymnasium Hof in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: West facade of the east wing of Schiller Gymnasium Hof in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: View from the Verdons summit in the ski resort of la Plagne (Alpes, France).--Pline 11:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Close-up of the facade with the main entrance of the Schiller Gymnasium, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Gulou Commercial Pedestrian Street in Tianjin --Ermell 09:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination Fountain at Tianhou Palace in Tianjin --Ermell 09:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Building at 9 rue Foulimou in Puylaurens, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 09:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 24, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: George S Eccles Student Life Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 03:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Please check the verticals and please add the geo location. --XRay 06:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Celebration of Life Monument, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 03:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Salt Lake City Public Library, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 03:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Seagull Monument and Salt Lake Assembly Hall, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 03:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: View over Prenzlauer Berg and Gesundbrunnen, Berlin --MB-one 21:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Vaude booth at OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 21:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Framo Stromer FP 200 from 1933 at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 19:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Bell tower of the Saint John the Baptist church in Jonquieres, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Karl Marx Street in the city of Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Au panier garni, fruit and vegetable store at Bergson, place du colonel Arnaud Beltrame, en:Saint-Étienne, France --Touam 07:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Soil near the Alexander crater. Nisyros, Greece --Ввласенко 06:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Latinoamerica tower, Mexico City: --Cvmontuy 04:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is tilted ccw. --Augustgeyler 11:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      would you please check again --Cvmontuy 03:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Hannes Wolf, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 23, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: The Völklingen ironworks viewed from a nearby bridge. Some chimneys of the blast furnace and the ore elevator are visible. --DavidJRasp 22:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Headframe of the mining shaft IV of the Grube Reden --DavidJRasp 22:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Holy Trinity Cathedral, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 20:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: 2002 Winter Olympics cauldron and Rice–Eccles Stadium, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 20:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Celebration of Life Monument, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 20:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Oil painting La Fundación de Santiago (1888) --Rjcastillo 18:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Rue Marie Henriette (Lyon) en janvier 2022. --Benoît Prieur 17:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Paris Ier église St-Germain Auxerrois horloge (by Mbzt) --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
      Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colors are washed out in the frescoes, left, right and above the clock. Is that due to glare and overexposure, or is it just because they've deteriorated over the years, or both? -- Ikan Kekek 03:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination F-14A Tomcat at Grumman Memorial Park, Long Island --Mike Peel 13:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline Nice composition, but is not sharp please use F11 or focus stacking --Cvmontuy 10:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination F-14A Tomcat at Grumman Memorial Park --Mike Peel 13:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Landscape in Parc du Héron regional nature reserve, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 09:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Landscape in Parc du Héron regional nature reserve, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 09:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Adrian Grbic, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 22, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Trolleybus Škoda 25Tr Irisbus number 3615 in Brno on Hlinky street --MIGORMCZ 20:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Trolleybus Škoda 27Tr Solaris number 3656 in Brno on Hlinky street --MIGORMCZ 20:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Trolleybus Škoda 27Tr Solaris number 3657 in Brno on Hlinky street --MIGORMCZ 20:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Trolleybus Škoda 27Tr Solaris number 3666 in Brno on Hlinky street --MIGORMCZ 20:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Trolleybus Škoda 31Tr SOR number 3623 in Brno on Hlinky street --MIGORMCZ 20:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Dragon boat race during Ribnitzer Hafenfest 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 20:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Joco Fountain, Tenerife --Mike Peel 18:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: Edward Harriman Memorial, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 15:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      The verticals should be vertical. --XRay 06:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos Veterans Memorial, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 15:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Perspective should be corrected and CA removed. --Ermell 17:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Peery Hotel, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S. --Another Believer 15:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 15:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: De Zandmotor op eerste kerstdag 2021, Golven met tegenwind en op de achtergrond de Maasvlakte. By User:Smiley.toerist --DavidJRasp 11:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed
    • Nomination: A red maple leaf (Acer platanoides) in October at the Rodenhof in Saarbrücken. --DavidJRasp 11:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 21, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination Sponge (Scalarispongia scalaris), Amphitheater, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 19:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support --Good quality. --IamMM 15:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Long-spined urchin (Diadema setosum), Pistol Bay, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 19:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Decline A little bit too grainy and unsharp in my view. Sorry. --Imehling 10:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination The old church of Fasnia, Tenerife --Mike Peel 18:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 10:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Shikara rowing in Dal lake, with Char Chinar in the background by User:Sofisuhail007 --Hulged 14:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 10:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Gates on the grounds of the Temple of Heaven in Beijing --Ermell 11:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 10:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination Lac d'Aurié in commune of Limogne-en-Quercy, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Promotion
      Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 19, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Flooded fields between Hemmendorf and Lahm in Itzgrund, aerial photograph --Ermell 10:20, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The bright parts are overexposed. --Imehling 17:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review needed

January 18, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: The svg graphic vector image depicting the Algorithm determines whether a year is a leap year or a common year in the Gregorian calendar.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Sanu N 10:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review
      for me is too simple, perhaps doing a multi language file increase the complexity allowing the QI --Ezarate 19:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 15, 2022[edit]

    • Nomination: Neighborhood of Les Menuires, France. --DimiTalen 12:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ok CAs on the high-voltage pylon (at left) ! But the composition is very good ! --Sebring12Hrs 12:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
      Thanks @Sebring12Hrs, I think I fixed it. Better? --DimiTalen 10:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nomination: Neighborhood of Les Menuires, France. --DimiTalen 12:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Soft purple CAs everywhere or it is juste impossible with snow ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Church_of_Panteleimon_the_Healer_-_01.jpg[edit]

Church of Panteleimon the Healer - 01.jpg

  • Nomination Church of Panteleimon the Healer in Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 20:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Imehling 17:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but this image needs a perspective correction. The camera was tilted very much to the sky, which unnecessarily increased the problem. --Augustgeyler 03:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --August Geyler (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austria_national_under-21_football_team_-_Teamcamp_June_2017_(087).jpg[edit]

Austria national under-21 football team - Teamcamp June 2017 (087).jpg

  • Nomination Arnel Jakupovic, player of Austria U21, when carrying a football goal. --Steindy 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In my eyes, the net is to disturbing here. --Milseburg 12:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
    [reply]
    • I disagree. I believe that it is precisely the situation of carrying the soccer goal that makes the difference. --Steindy 17:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • You don't see that. I thought he was just standing behind it.--Milseburg 18:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
        [reply]
        • You'll see tomorrow another photo where Jakupovic carries the goal with two other players. --Steindy 22:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
          • If you want to show players carrying a soccer goal, I would prefer a full shot where that's all complete, not a snippet. --Milseburg 08:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Milseburg. We don't see him carrying the goal, just blocked by mesh. -- Ikan Kekek 22:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yeah, I must agree.--Peulle 10:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Ikan Kekek 22:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucia_widow_(Palpopleura_lucia)_immature_male_Ghana.jpg[edit]

Lucia widow (Palpopleura lucia) immature male Ghana.jpg

  • Nomination Lucia widow (Palpopleura lucia) immature male --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree. Wings and tail are not sharp. --Steindy 16:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Steindy seems to me to have a good point, but Charles, I'd like to give your take on this a fair hearing. -- Ikan Kekek 11:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Revenge vote. Head and eyes are sharply in focus Ikan Kekek which is I think good for QI. Of course the wings are not in focus as you and anyone else with an understanding of depth of field would understand. Charlesjsharp 17:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I understand about the wings, but what about the tail? -- Ikan Kekek 20:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Has to be sharp for FPC, but for QI? FP from 2007! and an FP from 2015 that I voted against Charlesjsharp 14:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply and links. I thought I remembered you voting to decline QIC noms over unsharp abdomens. That was at FPC only? -- Ikan Kekek 15:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 13:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-headed_rock_agama_(Agama_agama)_female_juvenile.jpg[edit]

Red-headed rock agama (Agama agama) female juvenile.jpg

  • Nomination Red-headed rock agama (Agama agama) juvenile --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree. Only the head is sharp. --Steindy 16:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 13:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plain_Prinia_Front_Canal_Chennai_Jan22_D72_22775.jpg[edit]

Plain Prinia Front Canal Chennai Jan22 D72 22775.jpg

  • Nomination Plain prinia (Prinia inornata) perched in bush, front view, Chennai --Tagooty 06:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blown highlights on chest feathers --Charlesjsharp 10:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Doesn't look blown to me. Very good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 11:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paddyfield_Pipit_Canal_Chennai_Jan22_D72_22606.jpg[edit]

Paddyfield Pipit Canal Chennai Jan22 D72 22606.jpg

  • Nomination Paddyfield pipit (Anthus rufulus) on the ground, Buckingham Canal, Chennai --Tagooty 07:15, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 08:47, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too unsharp/noisy for me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Aquarelle effect from noise reduction software, unsharp. --Nino Verde (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 18:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]

  • Sat 22 Jan → Sun 30 Jan
  • Sun 23 Jan → Mon 31 Jan
  • Mon 24 Jan → Tue 01 Feb
  • Tue 25 Jan → Wed 02 Feb
  • Wed 26 Jan → Thu 03 Feb
  • Thu 27 Jan → Fri 04 Feb
  • Fri 28 Jan → Sat 05 Feb
  • Sat 29 Jan → Sun 06 Feb
  • Sun 30 Jan → Mon 07 Feb
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates&oldid=550334843"