Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Candidatas a imagens especiais

A página de projeto Candidatas a imagens especiais noutras línguas:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

Estas imagens são as candidatas para se tornarem em Imagens especiais. Por favor note que isto não é a mesma coisa que a imagem do dia.

Para ver o arquivo de nomeações prévias veja: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

FormalidadesEdit

NomeaçãoEdit

Se acha que encontrou ou criou uma imagem que possa ser considerada especial, então por favor adicione-a em baixo na secção de nomeações, no topo da página, editando este link.

Mas antes de o fazer, assegure que a imagem tem uma descrição apropriada e licenciamento.

Por favor vote ao usar a palavra na sua linguagem nos modelos em baixo:

Política de candidatura a imagem especialEdit

  • Período de votação de 9 dias. O resultado será determinado no 10º dia após a nomeação.
  • As nomeações feitas por anónimos são bem vindas.
  • As contribuições para a discussão feitas por anónimos são bem vindas.
  • Votos de anónimos não são contados.
  • As nomeações não contam como votos. O voto deve ser feito usando o modelo de voto.

A imagem candidata passará a ser uma imagem especial de acordo com as seguintes condições:

  1. Licença apropriada.
  2. Pelo menos 5 votos positivos.
  3. A relação de votos positivos/votos negativos terá de ser pelo menos 2/1 (uma maioria de dois terços, ou seja pelo menos 67% de apoio).

Para ver instruções sobre como lidar com nomeações antigas, veja Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

PropostasEdit

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Adenium Seed Pappus Black Uthandi Aug21 D72 20862.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2022 at 13:31:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 23.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2022 at 10:11:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:View of Krn (3).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2022 at 10:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:CN 8015, 5690 and 5517 Hinton - Jasper.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2022 at 07:26:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Cappadocia Aerial View Landscape.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2022 at 15:57:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Turkey
  •   Info I found this suitable for FP because of the beautiful golden light, the way that the path acts as a leading line towards the mountains in the distance, and the contrast in the landscape between the fields on the left hand side and the unusual cliff formations on the right. created by Benh - uploaded by Benh - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I agree --Lupe (talk) 22:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak   Oppose I'm unpersuaded this is one of the very best photos on the site. It's a little hazy and could be sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Like a fantasy setting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Fascinating landscape. Most photos I have seen from that area focus only on the bizarre rocks, this picture shows their situation. Some parts on the right are in the shadow, but the contrast between golden light on the left and bluish shadows on the right intensifies the ‘fantasy film set’ look mentionend by KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9774 (bw).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2022 at 14:41:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Neocancilla clathrus 01.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2022 at 08:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Snow geese flying up at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2022 at 03:55:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

  I withdraw my nomination --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Pintaflores Queen.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2022 at 19:03:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Lauda - Altstadt - Marienkirche - Innenansicht mit Blick zum Altar.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2022 at 11:17:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Buteo jamaicensis in flight at Llano Seco-1520.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2022 at 20:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus) female and male.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2022 at 19:40:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
  •   Info Male village weavers build a succession of nests in the hope of attracting a female. Living in a colony increases his chances of attracting a female, but only if his building skills are up to it. Here a female is checking out his handywork. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support As diligently as he toils, I believe he will win her heart :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Excellent. Nice that you captured the whole scene. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 08:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --IamMM (talk) 12:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Hulged (talk) 05:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 08:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay 💬 14:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Irresistible once the context is clear. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Agree with Daniel Case that context is helpful. Would suggest info notes for this nomination be added as extra info in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 06:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Oriental honey buzzard Mudumalai Mar21 DSC01405.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2022 at 15:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Family_:_Accipitridae_(Buzzards,_Eagles,_hawks_and_Kites)
  •   Info Oriental or Crested honey buzzard (Pernis ptilorhynchus). There are no FP's of genus Pernis, so I've linked to the Gallery for Family Accipitridae. Nominated earlier but withdrawn after comments that the sky was too purplish. I've corrected the WB based on photo of the scene taken with an iPhone. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The raptor blends into the dry season foliage, but stands out against the deep blue sky. The up-looking pose is unusual for a raptor. -- Tagooty (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support this version looks way more natural Lupe (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay 💬 18:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The leaves in the background aren't ideal, but it's a nice shot. Charlesjsharp (talk)
  •   Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --IamMM (talk) 14:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Sky is much better than in previous versions --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I still find the foliage, which is about the same color as the bird's feathers, distracting, but I won't oppose as a single vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Weak support per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Marian Anderson.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2022 at 10:43:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Women
  •   Info created by Carl Van Vechten - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Historically important photo. Any idea how big the print is? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: My feeling is fairly big, 5 to 8" wide , with the height whatever that works out to, but that's kind of an educated guess based on dust size and the appearance of the corners. Of course, the print, whatever the size, can only be as detailed as the negative, so I think we're getting all detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Great person and pose, but unfortunately this photo lacks sharpness --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
    • It's sharp for the time it was created. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support Yes, a little soft, but I find it compelling. I admit maybe I'm not judging objectively enough, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, no, I don't dig it at all. I like the pose and how the skin tones are handled. But those nicely nuanced mid-tones are lost among the strong contrast between the upper left corner and the dress. It's like trying to listen to the radio while there are two people yelling at each other. I also don't see the point in including so much of the dress when there is practically nothing to be seen in this area because it's all pitch black. A head-and-shoulders type crop could work for me, but this leaves me unimpressed. --El Grafo (talk) 12:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Reluctant oppose Historically important and Adam did his usual bangup job on the restoration. But the sharpness ... maybe it was the time but we've had pictures from that era that were better. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Kuradisild jõuluvalgustusega 2021. aasta detsembris.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2022 at 10:19:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Arctium tomentosum - Kulna.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2022 at 06:27:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pulpo patudo (Callistoctopus macropus), Cynthiana, Pafos, Chipre, 2021-12-11, DD 26.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2022 at 21:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
  •   Info White-spotted octopus (Callistoctopus macropus), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus. This species of octopus can be found in shallow areas of the Mediterranean Sea, the warmer parts of the eastern and western Atlantic Ocean, the Caribbean Sea, and the Indo-Pacific region. This octopus feeds on small organisms which lurk among the branches of corals and grows to a mantle length of 20 cm (8 in) with a total length of 150 cm (59 in). The first pair of arms are approx. 1 metre (3.3 ft) metre or so long, and are much longer than the remaining three pairs. The arms are all connected by a shallow web. This octopus is red, with white blotches on its body, and paired white spots on its arms. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --IamMM (talk) 13:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't know ... it just doesn't stand out for me like some of your other underwater pictures have. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Daniel Case: It does to me. I've seen maybe 50 octopus underwater in my life. Only one of them was not a common octopus (this one),...Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I also checked the material we had so far on Commons. Before I uploaded 4 images of this exemplar we had so far only 2 images in the corresponding category of this species one of 800KB resolution (taken from this website, where I couldn't find any free license, so a possible license violation) uploaded in 2009 and another one of 1100KB (US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) uploaded in 2004. My candidate has a resolution of 16MB. On the other side we have in Category:Octopus vulgaris 151 images not counting those from zoos. --Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Lupe (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Anémona de mar (Condylactis aurantiaca), Pistol Bay, Pafos, Chipre, 2021-12-12, DD 12.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2022 at 20:54:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
  •   Info Golden anemone (Condylactis aurantiaca), Pistol Bay, Paphos, Cyprus. This species of anemone is found only in the Mediterranean Sea in depths of up to 80 metres. The base is attached to a rock, stone or shell and the column immersed in sediment, usually sand or gravel, with only the oral disc and tentacles visible. The oral disc may reach 12 centimetres (4.7 in), the overall diameter with the tentacles spread out is around 30 centimetres (12 in) and each tentacle is around 8 centimetres (3 in) long, green to yellow in colour, and sometimes greyish. They often have bands of white and other colours, and purple tips. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Question what causes the green shadows please? The images I Google online do all have purple tips, and look quite different to this image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp: Valid point, It come from the shadows of the lighting I had to use (26 m deep). I fixed it. Poco a poco (talk) 21:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC) PD: I also retouched the WB and made it a bit warmer.
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Wish it weren't so noisy at the corners, but you were deep underwater. Still looks very Lovecraftian to me. Daniel Case (talk) 07:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Impressive, reminds me of Haeckel’s Kunstformen der Natur. --Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support High resolution and impressive Cmao20 (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --IamMM (talk) 13:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 08:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm having trouble getting excited about a not-that-sharp octopus, regardless of the difficulties of underwater photography, but this is a sharp photo with nice details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay 💬 14:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis) 5.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2022 at 22:25:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:2018-02-02 Junior World Championships Luge Altenberg 2018 – Female by Sandro Halank–061.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2022 at 11:21:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual snow sports
  •   Info 33rd Junior World Championship Luge, Altenberg 2018: Adriana Adam ; created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 11:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 11:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose A straightforward sports shot, I don’t see anything special about it. The white edge on the left is distracting. --Kreuzschnabel 14:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Kreuz. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Kreuz, good photo but IMO doesn't stand out. Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I don't know whether this is an FP or not, but the main feeling I get from this is that she looks uncomfortable and concerned to my eyes. Did she finish OK? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Georges Rochegrosse - Poster for the prèmiere of Claude Debussy and Maurice Maeterlinck's Pelléas et Mélisande.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2022 at 07:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
  •   Info created by Georges Rochegrosse - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Well done. --Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Wow, humongous! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: Collaboration of sorts with my 2020 self. Back then, I got all the big damage done, which took so long I burned out, but meant when I came back this time, I didn't burn out and could finish it. It's such a foundational opera in the modern canon that it really deserved it. Though if you mean the image size? Actually slightly smaller than last week's Pénélope. I'd say more difficult, though. Phototypes are a pain, and phototypes with a thousand tiny rips? Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I meant the image size, and fantastic quality at that size! Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Agreed. Would love to see the original painting, but I can't find any evidence it still exists. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
That's a shame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Unteroberndorf ABS Nürnberg-Ebensfeld Betonarbeiter-20160622-RM-085134.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 22:13:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
  •   Info Concrete workers on the ABS Nuremberg-Ebensfeld. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support To me unusual but interesting: Harmonious circular effect, the ends of the rebar are additionally giving direction to the main motif. The entire impression is visible in full-screen view. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per above ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Radomianin. Framing at its best. --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --El Grafo (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --August Geyler (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The framing makes the image distinct. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Daniel Cmao20 (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Kampen, stadsbrug. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 16:45:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
  •   Info Stadsbrug (Kampen) is a lifting bridge over the IJssel. (Lifting section).
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Normal image with nothing special --Wilfredor (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice structure and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan --Kritzolina (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Lupe (talk) 21:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Something different whose charm is revealed in detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The golden wheels and the warm sunlight make the bridge look like a sculpture. --Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Nice enough lighting and structure in preview, but comparably poor quality for current standards IMHO (noisy all over, much sharpening applied, bright parts look overexposed) at less than 10 MP. --Kreuzschnabel 09:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Wilfredor --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Reluctant weak oppose Interesting idea, but per Kreuz the technical problems are too much for an FP ... there's an awful lot of noise at the lower left.  Support Better now. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Very good composition. But resolution and the resulting level of detail are borderline. Perhaps this was cropped a bit to much. --August Geyler (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Composition is everything here. I am not really seeing the technical problems to be honest, though. Cmao20 (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cmao20 --IamMM (talk) 05:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay 💬 14:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Grey-crowned Babblers 1605.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 08:07:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Comment Snow, no? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Black Spur, Yarra Ranges NP, Vic, Australia - Diliff.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 08:02:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria

File:Tractor Vale Pereiro january 2022-2.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 00:12:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other_land_vehicles
  •   Info Composition in brown, blue and a little green, with a tractor. Cercal, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Tomer T (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Lovely composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Lupe (talk) 13:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good quality but no wow-factor to me. The gallery "land vehicles" seems inappropriate as this is mostly farmland or scenery. --Tagooty (talk) 02:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Tagooty. -- Karelj (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose no wow factor for me. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Weak support The trees in the rear are a little aggressively sharpened. But other than that, maybe I'm seeing it relative to the last two nominations I reviewed (and opposed), of which this almost seems to be a combination of their better aspects. There's a sort of poetry to this scene that I can't quite explain. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Daniel. No matter what the outcome will be (you know I like to provoke), it's good to know that someone else detected poetry in this scene! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I've looked at this a bunch of times, and it's not really working for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Vale Pereiro Janeiro 2022-1.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 00:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal
  •   Info Composition in brown and blue with a house, near the end of the day. Traditional house in Alentejo, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I think I see what you were going for here but I don't find it anything like as rewarding to look at as your other nomination. I think my problem is that the leading lines don't really...lead anywhere. For me a portrait format might not have been the right way to go here. Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    •   Comment Mmmh, I think a carefully composed square crop might work as well. --El Grafo (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose same Lupe (talk) 13:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support This one does work for me. The leading lines lead to the right of the house. Really harmonious composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Weak support I am still going forth and back about this one. One the one hand I love the simplicity and the contrast between the structure of the sky and the structure of the field; on the other hand I always stumble over the crop. (IMHO El Grafo’s idea of a square crop could be an ideal solution.) --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:2021-01-15 Eberspächer Luge World Cup Oberhof 1DX 4893 by Stepro.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2022 at 14:22:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  •   Info Jan Eichhorn (luge trainer) pictured through ring light in heavy snowfall; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
  •   Support -- Stepro (talk) 14:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support To me it's really an unusual composition, but interesting and eye-catching. The blurred ring gives the whole image more depth and focus. Additionally, the scene reminds me of the genre "Behind The Scenes Photography". The technical quality is also very good. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment There are dust spots on top. What exactly is this ring and what is its purpose other than to create some unusual setting? --A.Savin 22:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Thanks for pointing to this. I removed the two dust spots. This is a normal ring light (ultimately a lamp). It was used here to illuminate the trainer's face for a video recording. The video camera was to my right, he's looking right there. I just use this setting for an unusual shot. --Stepro (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Publicity of DHL is too much distracting to me --Wilfredor (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    • My goal is to represent reality as well as possible. In reality, athletes and officials wear advertising on their clothing. --Stepro (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think it would be better off cropped to be more of a square with the ringlight more centered. Daniel Case (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Thanks, but I see no advantage in cropping it. The telling background would get lost. --Stepro (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not a striking composition to me. Cropping of part of the ring and the positioning in the circle detract, IMO. --Tagooty (talk) 02:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The asymmetry of the bottom crop of the ring light bugs me, too. Good photo but I'm not feeling it as an FP. I would have preferred a square photo with even crops of the ring light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I just do not understand the composition --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Hyla japonica sep01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2022 at 19:55:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • now   Support Many thanks to Aristeas. I really like this pic, and don't think it is to soft. --Stepro (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Will support if the above issues are fixed. Also I think the foreground could do with being cropped. Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I will try to fix these spots (just letting you know to avoid that two people do the same work …) --Aristeas (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It will still be too soft, so may not be worth your time, Aristeas. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Done I hope I have got them all. – I tend to agree, Charles. But since removing stains is easy and several people like the picture, I thought I’d do them the favour. --Aristeas (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support When low the ISO is not posible, I preffer sensor noise because is information usefull than a artificial AI filter that allways destroy information --Wilfredor (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support for the edited version. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support ... I don't see any spots in the image now. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --IamMM (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too soft. --Tagooty (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I'm still undecided, but it would be nice if the flowers were identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Surely better to ask. Why is the frog on the flower? Answer: because someone put it there. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Since I didn't take the picture I don't know which flower it is or whether the frog was put on it for the picture. However Japanese tree frogs are often found on vegetation (engl. Wikipedia: "These tree frogs are commonly found in rice paddies, and rest during the day on rice leaves and other broad-leaved vegetation."), so it wouldn't be impossible to find it coincidentally or at least I would say it's not unnatural behavior. Also look at the species category with lots of frogs on vegetation. Lupe (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't think a frog cares for the difference. Lupe (talk) 15:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Wrong. A frog would be unlikely to choose to reveal itself on a bright red background. Moving the frog is fine, but putting it on a red flower is just silly. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Well, what is "unlikely"?. It's already unlikely since most vegetation is green. Frogs certainly react more to movement than color. So I belive they would jump on red surfaces, see also other examples frog on red apple, frog on red flower #1 #2, #3 Lupe (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Irrespective of this discussion, I find the foreground too distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Water wheel - Zell am Harmersbach 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2022 at 09:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
  •   Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Llez (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:07, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --IamMM (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not impressed with the lighting, a bit ordinary IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 05:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay 💬 09:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No wow to me, very normal --Wilfredor (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose same Lupe (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Wilfredor. While the subject as such is nice, this it not an outstanding image of it. I just can’t see any inspired composition here: main subject centered, shrubbery on both sides cut off and partly covering the wheel, much uninteresting foreground. Taken closer at shorter focal length might have given a much more impressive shot. Foliage in background looks hopelessly overprocessed. --Kreuzschnabel 11:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose With King of Hearts. --August Geyler (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Obstructing bush, hiding part of the subject. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Bush is a part of composition. For me it's like saying that you cannot see the forest, because leaves are in the way. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Ericushöft (Hamburg-HafenCity).08.12471.ajb.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2022 at 05:09:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Dust spots removed --Ajepbah (talk) 17:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Abstain Good quality photo but I honestly don't like the motif or see it as interesting so I think it's best if I don't vote. Cmao20 (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Michielverbeek. Also subject of image is not anything special for FP nomination, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 15:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Subject of image is the historic quay wall 'Ericushöft' in the center (cultural heritage monument #12471). Not very spectacular, but IMHO quite remarkable in particular in contrast to the modern buildings on top ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Gespietste kastanje 13-01-2022. (d.j.b).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2022 at 16:36:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Candidatas_a_imagens_especiais&oldid=243318777"