User talk:FML/archive/06-08-2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image Tagging Image:Santos_dumont_3287632.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Santos_dumont_3287632.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dantadd 01:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bebeu cândida hoje, que tipo de email é aquele? Segura as pontas aí rapaz! Dantadd 00:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Não sei por que motivo você está tão agressivo. Eu não apaguei nenhuma imagem sua sem motivo e, principalmente, sem a opinião de terceiros. Quanto à imagem em questão, apenas marquei que falta a fonte e, se você informar a fonte exata da imagem, não haverá qualquer problema. Quanto ao símbolo do PT, veja minhas mensagens para o Gaf para entender minimamente a discussão e depois pode palpitar à vontade, até propor para eliminação mediante nomeação regular (não speedy deletion). Dantadd 16:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aliás, você que é melhor do que eu em assuntos tecnológicos, poderia tentar resolver o problema com a Image:PSDB.jpg. Dantadd 16:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Eu definitivamente não sei por que você está agressivo. Não fiz nada que justifique tal comportamento e não vou gastar minhas pestanas. Se quiser conversar de forma adulta, estarei disponível. Dantadd 14:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Você continua o mesmo. Tem lampejos de adulto e depois lampejos de uma criança de cinco anos. Eu não apaguei nenhuma imagem sua. Propus para eliminação aquelas que acreditava que deveriam ser eliminadas. Outras pessoas opinaram, não agi arbitrariamente. Não vou alongar essa troca inútil de mensagens. Tenho estado muito gentil com você há bastante tempo, portanto a agressividade da sua parte é gratuita. Dantadd 01:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Você faz uma tempestade em copo d'água. A imagem do Santos Dumont (revisei várias imagens dele, como você poderá notar no histórico) foi marcada como "sem fontes" porque, veja que absurdo, não tinha fontes. Eu reconheço que poderia ter mandado uma mensagem personalizada em vez de usar a marcação, este foi meu erro. Dantadd 13:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Realmente faltava a fonte. Toda caixa de descrição continha apenas isso:
== Descrição do ficheiro ==
[[Category:Santos-Dumont]]
== Licensing ==
{{PD-old}}

Como eu disse, poderia ter deixando uma mensagem aqui sem ser a automática. Foi esse o meu erro, mas você tem de reconhecer que a sua reação foi um pouco exagerada e injusta. Enfim, deixa pra lá. Dantadd 18:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olá[edit]

Olá, estava lendo o artigo do Antonio Carlos Jobim e vi que não tem nenhuma imagem no artigo. Será tão difícil assim conseguir a permisssão para alguma foto sobre MPB ou foto dele?
até mais.
em abraço.
me manda a resposta por email se possível: [email protected];
201.74.175.162 05:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:ReligiousSymbols.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:ReligiousSymbols.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  eesti  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  français  español  Esperanto  English  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

72.88.139.72 06:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning[edit]

Image deletion warning A file has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  eesti  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  français  español  Esperanto  English  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

abf /talk to me/ 12:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Wikipedia website.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wikipedia website.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Yarnalgo (talk) 22:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, FML/archive!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 12:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moje Fotopedie[edit]

Normalny specjalny


File:A room.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:A room.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Simonxag (talk) 00:30, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Cat black 8272162434.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cat black 8272162434.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding watermarks[edit]

Hi, I noticed you added a watermark reading "publicdomain" at File:Itápolisbandeira.jpg. Watermarks are strongly discouraged at Commons - please do not add them to any image in the future, for any reason. Thank you. Dcoetzee (talk) 04:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Money_(reais).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Money_(reais).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shureg (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]