User talk:FML/archive/18-07-2005

Image:Foto recursiva do artigo da wikipedia.jpg

Hi, let me just add that Firefox and Wikipedia are not free, both are protected by copyright. In addition to the copyright, they are licensed in a way which allows users to modify them. Thuresson 04:36, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Artigo dasidjsaljdslkas.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Artigo dasidjsaljdslkas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. Cette page est proposée dans la liste des images à supprimer, vous êtes invité à donner votre avis sur la question.

The original image had be put under CC license by SHARI, the copyright owner, so I think the new one cannot be GNU, but have to stay CC. Yug talk 8 July 2005 19:43 (UTC)

The same license than the original is need, and the name of the first copyright owner have to stay. The name of the other "artists" can be add. Yug talk 8 July 2005 20:01 (UTC)

That's perfect ;) Yug talk 00:33, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

misundersanding

CU means "see you" in english sorry for that. --Paddy 08:16, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Fotos

Olá FML! Obrigado pelo elogio... :) Lusitana 12:14, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

O.O

I like correct people in english because that's usualy other whom correct mine ~~ Yug talk 18:27, 14 July 2005 (UTC) >0<"

Image:Adoptfirefox.jpg

Dear friend, hello how are you?
Well, I'm fine. The question is: The ilustration "Image:Adoptfirefox.jpg" is OK? I ask it because I made other pic (see Image:Adoptfirefox-pt.png) based at it and I don't know if is OK. Please, try to tell with me, therefore my English is not ok. Thank you! --FML ^hi 04:37, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Well, it will depend on what happens with Image:Adoptfirefox.jpg. If that one can't be kept, unfortunately yours can't either. dbenbenn | talk 05:36, 17 July 2005 (UTC)